mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@google.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>,
	Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>
Subject: modules still have .debug_* (was Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARC unwinder switch to .eh_frame)
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:59:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <caee47ec-eb68-59ee-50dc-ee02c4d78b7d@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE2F3rA0FrrNiHe6W6DSqYmpTyTiVD3h-wpGtW7rJ07RJLqqgw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Daniel,

On 09/19/2016 06:21 PM, Daniel Mentz wrote:
> I confirmed that the .eh_frame section is present and that the
> .debug_frame section is absent. I also verified that the file size of
> the .ko files are small enough for our embedded platform and that
> unnecessary sections like .debug_info, .debug_line, .debug_str etc.
> are also absent.

BTW it seems with my latest set of patches, modules still have .debug_*.
Can you double check if your tree still has the interim patch which added a linker
script for modules to strip out .debug_*

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-snps-arc/2016-September/001483.html

I'm not planning to carry it and would prefer addressing the the root cause by
removing the -gdwarf-2 toggle. I've added that and pushed rebased series. Care to
take it for a respin please.

Thx,
-Vineet

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-09-22 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-19 21:49 [PATCH 0/3] ARC unwinder switch to .eh_frame Vineet Gupta
2016-09-19 21:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARC: module: support R_ARC_32_PCREL relocation Vineet Gupta
2016-09-19 21:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARC: dw2 unwind: factor CIE specifics for .eh_frame/.debug_frame Vineet Gupta
2016-09-19 21:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARC: dw2 unwind: switch to .eh_frame based unwinding Vineet Gupta
2016-09-20  1:21 ` [PATCH 0/3] ARC unwinder switch to .eh_frame Daniel Mentz
2016-09-20  6:13   ` Vineet Gupta
2016-09-22 20:39     ` Vineet Gupta
2016-09-22 20:59   ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2016-09-22 22:37     ` modules still have .debug_* (was Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARC unwinder switch to .eh_frame) Daniel Mentz
2016-09-23 10:38       ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-09-24  1:04         ` Daniel Mentz
2016-09-26 12:38           ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-09-26 18:51             ` Daniel Mentz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=caee47ec-eb68-59ee-50dc-ee02c4d78b7d@synopsys.com \
    --to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
    --cc=Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com \
    --cc=danielmentz@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome