Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mailbox: mediatek,gce-mailbox: Add mediatek,gce-events definition

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 18/12/2023 09:36, Jason-JH.Lin wrote:
> Since mediatek,gce-events property is a HW event signal from GCE,
> it should be defined in mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml and change the

Why? None of the bindings reference it. Did you just move property from
one device to completely different one?

> description of mediatek,gce-events property in other bindings to
> reference mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml  | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml
> index cef9d7601398..e4da0a58c943 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml
> @@ -49,6 +49,13 @@ properties:
>      items:
>        - const: gce
>  
> +  mediatek,gce-events:
> +    description:
> +      The event id which is mapping to the specific hardware event signal
> +      to gce. The event id is defined in the gce header
> +      include/dt-bindings/gce/<chip>-gce.h of each chips.
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array

Where are the constraints?

Best regards,
Krzysztof