From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>,
kernel-team@android.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add required-opps support to devfreq passive gov
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 16:54:21 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb0d4aad-81e4-0b8d-40f2-7f58ef1e38d9@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190724014222.110767-1-saravanak@google.com>
Dear Saravana,
Any other progress of this series?
Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
On 7/24/19 10:42 AM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> The devfreq passive governor scales the frequency of a "child" device based
> on the current frequency of a "parent" device (not parent/child in the
> sense of device hierarchy). As of today, the passive governor requires one
> of the following to work correctly:
> 1. The parent and child device have the same number of frequencies
> 2. The child device driver passes a mapping function to translate from
> parent frequency to child frequency.
>
> When (1) is not true, (2) is the only option right now. But often times,
> all that is required is a simple mapping from parent's frequency to child's
> frequency.
>
> Since OPPs already support pointing to other "required-opps", add support
> for using that to map from parent device frequency to child device
> frequency. That way, every child device driver doesn't have to implement a
> separate mapping function anytime (1) isn't true.
>
> Some common (but not comprehensive) reason for needing a devfreq passive
> governor to adjust the frequency of one device based on another are:
>
> 1. These were the combination of frequencies that were validated/screened
> during the manufacturing process.
> 2. These are the sensible performance combinations between two devices
> interacting with each other. So that when one runs fast the other
> doesn't become the bottleneck.
> 3. Hardware bugs requiring some kind of frequency ratio between devices.
>
> For example, the following mapping can't be captured in DT as it stands
> today because the parent and child device have different number of OPPs.
> But with this patch series, this mapping can be captured cleanly.
>
> In arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-bus.dtsi you have something
> like this with the following changes:
>
> bus_g2d_400: bus0 {
> compatible = "samsung,exynos-bus";
> clocks = <&cmu_top CLK_ACLK_G2D_400>;
> clock-names = "bus";
> operating-points-v2 = <&bus_g2d_400_opp_table>;
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> bus_noc2: bus9 {
> compatible = "samsung,exynos-bus";
> clocks = <&cmu_mif CLK_ACLK_BUS2_400>;
> clock-names = "bus";
> operating-points-v2 = <&bus_noc2_opp_table>;
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> bus_g2d_400_opp_table: opp_table2 {
> compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> opp-shared;
>
> opp-400000000 {
> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <400000000>;
> opp-microvolt = <1075000>;
> required-opps = <&noc2_400>;
> };
> opp-267000000 {
> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <267000000>;
> opp-microvolt = <1000000>;
> required-opps = <&noc2_200>;
> };
> opp-200000000 {
> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <200000000>;
> opp-microvolt = <975000>;
> required-opps = <&noc2_200>;
> };
> opp-160000000 {
> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <160000000>;
> opp-microvolt = <962500>;
> required-opps = <&noc2_134>;
> };
> opp-134000000 {
> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <134000000>;
> opp-microvolt = <950000>;
> required-opps = <&noc2_134>;
> };
> opp-100000000 {
> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
> opp-microvolt = <937500>;
> required-opps = <&noc2_100>;
> };
> };
>
> bus_noc2_opp_table: opp_table6 {
> compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>
> noc2_400: opp-400000000 {
> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <400000000>;
> };
> noc2_200: opp-200000000 {
> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <200000000>;
> };
> noc2_134: opp-134000000 {
> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <134000000>;
> };
> noc2_100: opp-100000000 {
> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
> };
> };
>
> -Saravana
>
> v3 -> v4:
> - Fixed documentation comments
> - Fixed order of functions in .h file
> - Renamed the new xlate API
> - Caused _set_required_opps() to fail if all required opps tables aren't
> linked.
> v2 -> v3:
> - Rebased onto linux-next.
> - Added documentation comment for new fields.
> - Added support for lazy required-opps linking.
> - Updated Ack/Reviewed-bys.
> v1 -> v2:
> - Cached OPP table reference in devfreq to avoid looking up every time.
> - Renamed variable in passive governor to be more intuitive.
> - Updated cover letter with examples.
>
>
> Saravana Kannan (5):
> OPP: Allow required-opps even if the device doesn't have power-domains
> OPP: Add function to look up required OPP's for a given OPP
> OPP: Improve required-opps linking
> PM / devfreq: Cache OPP table reference in devfreq
> PM / devfreq: Add required OPPs support to passive governor
>
> drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 6 ++
> drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c | 20 ++++--
> drivers/opp/core.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/opp/of.c | 108 ++++++++++++++---------------
> drivers/opp/opp.h | 5 ++
> include/linux/devfreq.h | 2 +
> include/linux/pm_opp.h | 11 +++
> 7 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-14 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20190724014230epcas5p371a5fdee330f91a646d619fbcc024acf@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2019-07-24 1:42 ` Saravana Kannan
2019-07-24 1:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] OPP: Allow required-opps even if the device doesn't have power-domains Saravana Kannan
2019-07-24 1:42 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] OPP: Add function to look up required OPP's for a given OPP Saravana Kannan
2019-07-24 1:42 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] OPP: Improve required-opps linking Saravana Kannan
2019-07-24 17:59 ` Sibi Sankar
2019-07-24 21:13 ` Saravana Kannan
2019-07-24 1:42 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] PM / devfreq: Cache OPP table reference in devfreq Saravana Kannan
2019-07-24 1:42 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] PM / devfreq: Add required OPPs support to passive governor Saravana Kannan
2019-07-25 2:30 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Add required-opps support to devfreq passive gov Viresh Kumar
2019-07-25 3:40 ` Saravana Kannan
2019-07-25 5:22 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-26 1:56 ` Saravana Kannan
2019-11-14 7:54 ` Chanwoo Choi [this message]
2019-11-14 8:23 ` Saravana Kannan
2019-11-14 8:35 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-11-14 19:39 ` Saravana Kannan
2019-11-14 8:39 ` Chanwoo Choi
2019-12-19 16:17 ` Chanwoo Choi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cb0d4aad-81e4-0b8d-40f2-7f58ef1e38d9@samsung.com \
--to=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sibis@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®