From: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Miroslav Benes" <mbenes@suse.cz>,
"Emil Velikov" <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Modules updates for v5.12
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 20:36:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb28abc8-5c4c-90c2-e3f2-a939ff507a8b@prevas.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNAQUL4qEgk97z0WfagVDgGAARzj8hqFyrC2wnPjiLduEoQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 24/02/2021 15.40, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 5:33 PM Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> +++ Linus Torvalds [23/02/21 12:03 -0800]:
>>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 12:01 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Does your build now enable TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS but previously didn't by
>>>> chance?
>>>
>>> Crossed emails.
>>>
>>> This is plain "make allmodconfig", so yes, now it will enable TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS.
>>>
>>> This is unacceptably slow. If that symbol trimming takes 30% of the
>>> whole kernel build time, it needs to be fixed or removed.
>>
>> [ Adding Masahiro to CC ]
>>
>> It looks like CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS had been hiding behind
>> CONFIG_UNUSED_SYMBOLS all this time, and once the EXPORT_UNUSED_SYMBOL
>> stuff was removed, it exposed that option to be selected by
>> allyesconfig. That option had previously caused build issues on
>> powerpc on linux-next, so I had temporarily marked that as BROKEN on
>> powerpc until Masahiro's fix landed in linux-next. I was not aware of
>> the additional build slowdown issue :/ In any case, Christoph's
>> suggestion to invert the option sounds reasonable, since the mips
>> defconfig selects it, it does not seem totally unused.
>
>
> TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS builds the tree twice by its concept.
>
> [1] 1st build
> At this point of time, we do not know which EXPORT_SYMBOL()
> is needed. So, EXPORT_SYMBOL() is enabled, or noop'ed
> based on the temporal guess.
> (in the fresh build, EXPORT_SYMBOL() are all nooped.)
>
> [2] Get the list of symbols needed to resolve all symbol references.
> (this information is collected in include/generated/autoksyms.h)
>
> [3] 2nd build
> Rebuild the objects whose EXPORT_SYMBOL()
> must be flipped.
I'm thinking we should be able to generate a linker script snippet from
[2] and use that when linking vmlinux, so there's no recursion and no
rebuild of individual .o files (and all the __cond_export_sym trickery
goes away).
The ksymtab entry for foo is already emitted in its own ___ksymtab+foo
section (or ___ksymtab_gpl+foo). So if the sorted list of undefined
symbols listed in the .mod files (plus the whitelist) consist of foo,
bar and baz, generate a header to be included by vmlinux.lds.h that says
#define KSYMTAB_SECTIONS \
___ksymtab+foo \
___ksymtab+bar \
___ksymtab+baz \
#define KSYMTAB_GPL_SECTIONS \
___ksymtab_gpl+foo \
___ksymtab_gpl+bar \
___ksymtab_gpl+baz \
with a !CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS definition of these that just says
#define KSYMTAB_SECTIONS ___ksymtab+*
#define KSYMTAB_GPL_SECTIONS ___ksymtab_gpl+*
and use that
__ksymtab AT(ADDR(__ksymtab) - LOAD_OFFSET) { \
__start___ksymtab = .; \
KEEP(*(SORT(KSYMTAB_SECTIONS))) \
__stop___ksymtab = .; \
Only one of ___ksymtab+foo and ___ksymtab_gpl+foo will exist, but that
doesn't matter (it's really no different from the fact that many files
(i.e. the * before "(SORT") don't contain any section matching
___ksymtab_gpl+*).
We may then have to add another discard section to put the remaining
___ksymtab_gpl+* sections in, but that's fine as long as that stanza
just appears later in the linker script.
If LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION was more widely supported (and I was
surprised to see that it's not even available on arm or x86) one could
also play another game, dropping the KEEP()s and instead create a linker
script snippet containing EXTERN(__ksymtab_foo __ksymtab_bar ...),
referencing the "struct kernel_symbol" elements themselves rather than
the singleton sections they reside in.
Rasmus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-24 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-23 15:42 Jessica Yu
2021-02-23 18:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-02-23 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-02-23 19:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-02-23 20:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-23 20:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-02-23 20:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-02-24 7:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-24 14:13 ` Jessica Yu
2021-02-24 14:46 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-02-24 15:30 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-02-24 16:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-02-24 8:33 ` Jessica Yu
2021-02-24 14:40 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-02-24 19:36 ` Rasmus Villemoes [this message]
2021-02-25 15:49 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-02-25 16:17 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-02-25 16:19 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2021-02-25 18:37 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-02-23 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-02-23 20:32 ` pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cb28abc8-5c4c-90c2-e3f2-a939ff507a8b@prevas.dk \
--to=rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk \
--cc=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome