From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756160Ab3L3QlG (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Dec 2013 11:41:06 -0500 Received: from canardo.mork.no ([148.122.252.1]:47819 "EHLO canardo.mork.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756010Ab3L3QlE (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Dec 2013 11:41:04 -0500 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: <5562479.pVWRuDL0y6@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: try to resume policies which failed on last resume From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn_Mork?= Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 17:40:45 +0100 To: Viresh Kumar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: Lists linaro-kernel , Patch Tracking , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Message-ID: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Yes, that's good. As you might have guessed by the lack of any response, I won't be able to test this in 2013. Thanks for all the good work! Bjørn Viresh Kumar wrote: >On 27 December 2013 15:27, Viresh Kumar >wrote: >> I think there is nothing much different in this patch compared to >what Bjorn >> tested. So you can probably push that now and let him test linux-next >later >> once he is back? > >Just saw that you already pushed it. :)