From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fanzine2.igalia.com (fanzine2.igalia.com [213.97.179.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 448693A1E66; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 16:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.97.179.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768408713; cv=none; b=gQpdjj310LUkYWyhLv63QaR9EaCxUWQVtxavEyL8vqzy+Q3Jfx7nNd1xR08GJ7BM+SUV0+OhJoxT9uxBikZyaTgwNjrkbz4zWvdegYq/JQ2upeD+lnpjPQZLC3dtrChpcJWClXi7YIp3EIYM1mfxzQL8ffORdb1NHe8srUmd4cA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768408713; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/DFbk4bWQdmProW1/5+uetwcFB6FreSLo5Piq1yNVzg=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=HmK+eCJPpZdiDc8Obe+N8ncKOnZiNu/+KSJIwBs6pgg7Q8Ztktu0yWO6WsOubCui+pzXny+JdKPkPMAsvp2T10KIceg3ItKps4cSbOsQ3x2pzfeerU/vhBv7KcIbbJnr+HP/EIVfw3tPyrYl7GHBPGQHVjBJ7RHbWCvE7tYydhk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=igalia.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=igalia.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=igalia.com header.i=@igalia.com header.b=RrDRW3+6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.97.179.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=igalia.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=igalia.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=igalia.com header.i=@igalia.com header.b="RrDRW3+6" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=igalia.com; s=20170329; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KUF3ougF3Q9JUs67uSURJ3D+CBB/q/SFzNi1ZOftFWg=; b=RrDRW3+6dEnWAcenTJBGFPVX8d SGkAuEvymx9i0BSDS/7nWgqHlVfPcK0lszAcIDko6p/jKcWiKPLBW5irxaMus6QmtZ7o9vqNv9Sq5 NlmtMlEltyhQV9KHWwMqUsJu7SJ8+ieLSlDhA1f3HW8WB93bbmw436b3Yl/WFMxbnPyyeXwvdV1vJ h99TJIxl7MnfLMgk2Mv2AbauC+t950t/HeWFKeeadGPk+5THxQbMC8gjQLnzY14AOyVMIy871KSyF tRkOVcOW7fZgpOzBnvGfviHZJtXPVAwQY2IjxRLK7OeKjOIOV7iFKrMTgAQoYb3Z19Rbfgbc56Tnp LSrWV4gA==; Received: from [177.139.22.247] (helo=[192.168.15.100]) by fanzine2.igalia.com with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_128_GCM:128) (Exim) id 1vg3sp-005MFt-Vt; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 17:38:12 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 13:38:06 -0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] exportfs: Rename get_uuid() to get_disk_uuid() To: Amir Goldstein Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" , Chuck Lever , Jeff Layton , NeilBrown , Olga Kornievskaia , Dai Ngo , Tom Talpey , Carlos Maiolino , Chris Mason , David Sterba , Miklos Szeredi , Christian Brauner , Alexander Viro , Christoph Hellwig , Jan Kara , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-dev@igalia.com References: <20260114-tonyk-get_disk_uuid-v1-0-e6a319e25d57@igalia.com> <20260114-tonyk-get_disk_uuid-v1-1-e6a319e25d57@igalia.com> <20260114061028.GF15551@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20260114062424.GA10805@lst.de> Content-Language: en-US From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9_Almeida?= In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Em 14/01/2026 07:12, Amir Goldstein escreveu: [...] > > Whether or not we should repurpose the existing get_uuid() I don't > know - that depends whether pNFS expects the same UUID from an > "xfs clone" as overlayfs would. > If we go in that direction, do you think it would be reasonable to have this as a super_block member/helper? Also do you know any other fs that require this type of workaround on ovl?