From: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: <anna-maria@linutronix.de>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>,
<bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hrtimers: Update new CPU's next event in hrtimers_cpu_dying()
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 11:18:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb65f989-eb16-f2d0-3a58-32deb3f65fb8@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aG0RxASJqknbaUkM@localhost.localdomain>
Hi Frederic,
On 2025/7/8 20:40, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Le Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 06:17:27PM +0800, Xiongfeng Wang a écrit :
>> When testing softirq based hrtimers on an ARM32 board, with high
>> resolution mode and nohz are both inactive, softirq based hrtimers
>> failed to trigger when moved away from an offline CPU. The flowpath
>> is as follows.
>>
>> CPU0 CPU1
>> softirq based hrtimers are queued
>> offline CPU1
>> move hrtimers to CPU0 in hrtimers_cpu_dying()
>> send IPI to CPU0 to retrigger next event
>> 'softirq_expires_next' is KTIME_MAX
>> call retrigger_next_event()
>> highres and nohz is inactive,just return
>> 'softirq_expires_next' is not updated
>> hrtimer softirq is never triggered
>>
>> Some softirq based hrtimers are queued on CPU1. Then we offline CPU1.
>> hrtimers_cpu_dying() moves hrtimers from CPU1 to CPU0, and then it send
>> a IPI to CPU0 to let CPU0 call retrigger_next_event(). But high
>> resolution mode and nohz are both inactive. So retrigger_next_event()
>> just returned. 'softirq_expires_next' is never updated and remains
>> KTIME_MAX. So hrtimer softirq is never raised.
>>
>> To fix this issue, we call hrtimer_update_next_event() in
>> hrtimers_cpu_dying() to update 'softirq_expires_next' for the new CPU.
>> It also update hardirq hrtimer's next event, but it should have no bad
>> effect.
>>
>> Fixes: 5c0930ccaad5 ("hrtimers: Push pending hrtimers away from outgoing CPU earlier")
>> Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
>> index 30899a8cc52c..ff97eb36c116 100644
>> --- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
>> +++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
>> @@ -2298,8 +2298,11 @@ int hrtimers_cpu_dying(unsigned int dying_cpu)
>> /*
>> * The migration might have changed the first expiring softirq
>> * timer on this CPU. Update it.
>> + * We also need to update 'softirq_expires_next' here, because it will
>> + * not be updated in retrigger_next_event() if high resolution mode
>> + * and nohz are both inactive.
>> */
>> - __hrtimer_get_next_event(new_base, HRTIMER_ACTIVE_SOFT);
>> + hrtimer_update_next_event(new_base);
>> /* Tell the other CPU to retrigger the next event */
>> smp_call_function_single(ncpu, retrigger_next_event, NULL, 0);
>
> It seems that a similar problem can happen while enqueueing a timer
> from an offline CPU (see the call to smp_call_function_single_async()).
>
> How about this (untested) instead? retrigger_next_event, is not a fast
> path so we don't care about rare extra cost:
This modification can solve the problem. Thanks a lot.
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> index 30899a8cc52c..e8c479329282 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> @@ -787,10 +787,10 @@ static void retrigger_next_event(void *arg)
> * of the next expiring timer is enough. The return from the SMP
> * function call will take care of the reprogramming in case the
> * CPU was in a NOHZ idle sleep.
> + *
> + * In periodic low resolution mode, the next softirq expiration
> + * must also be updated.
> */
> - if (!hrtimer_hres_active(base) && !tick_nohz_active)
> - return;
Once we remove this check. The problem disappears.
Also I noticed that we check whether highres is active before we really program
the hardware in __hrtimer_reprogram(). So if the above check in
retrigger_next_event() is just to decrease extra cost, I think we can remove it.
Thanks,
Xiongfeng
> -
> raw_spin_lock(&base->lock);
> hrtimer_update_base(base);
> if (hrtimer_hres_active(base))
> @@ -2295,11 +2295,6 @@ int hrtimers_cpu_dying(unsigned int dying_cpu)
> &new_base->clock_base[i]);
> }
>
> - /*
> - * The migration might have changed the first expiring softirq
> - * timer on this CPU. Update it.
> - */
> - __hrtimer_get_next_event(new_base, HRTIMER_ACTIVE_SOFT);
> /* Tell the other CPU to retrigger the next event */
> smp_call_function_single(ncpu, retrigger_next_event, NULL, 0);
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-09 3:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-08 10:17 Xiongfeng Wang
2025-07-08 12:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-07-08 16:23 ` 答复: " Wangshaobo (bobo)
2025-07-08 16:45 ` Wangshaobo (bobo)
2025-07-09 3:18 ` Xiongfeng Wang [this message]
2025-07-09 12:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cb65f989-eb16-f2d0-3a58-32deb3f65fb8@huawei.com \
--to=wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®