Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] dts: qcom: arm64: qcom: sdm845: use defines for VMIDs

[Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>]

On 3.04.2023 18:22, Dylan Van Assche wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 2023-04-03 at 17:47 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 03/04/2023 17:32, Dylan Van Assche wrote:
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2023-04-03 at 11:20 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 01/04/2023 19:35, Dylan Van Assche wrote:
>>>>> Use VMID defines for SLPI's FastRPC node in the Qualcomm SDM845
>>>>> DTS
>>>>> instead of hardcoded magic values.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dylan Van Assche <me@dylanvanassche.be>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 4 +++-
>>>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>>>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>>>>> index 1f25a7f4e02b..dc4b553cbe2e 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>>>>>  #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h>
>>>>>  #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,videocc-sdm845.h>
>>>>>  #include <dt-bindings/dma/qcom-gpi.h>
>>>>> +#include <dt-bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.h>
>>>>>  #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>>>>>  #include <dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,osm-l3.h>
>>>>>  #include <dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdm845.h>
>>>>> @@ -3372,7 +3373,8 @@ fastrpc {
>>>>>                                         qcom,glink-channels =
>>>>> "fastrpcglink-apps-dsp";
>>>>>                                         label = "sdsp";
>>>>>                                         qcom,non-secure-domain;
>>>>> -                                       qcom,vmids = <0x3 0xF
>>>>> 0x5
>>>>> 0x6>;
>>>>
>>>> Didn't you just add it in previous patch? Don't add incorrect
>>>> code
>>>> which
>>>> you immediately change.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Both are similar, the code is in fact the same. I followed what
>>> Konrad
>>> suggested in v3 to make a patch on top:
>>
>> I don't understand. Device nodes are similar, but they are different?
>> If
>> you add a line in patch X and change it in patch X+1, then something
>> is
>> wrong. Isn't this the case here or these are different device nodes?
>>
> 
> They are the same node.
> In the original patch the values are hex values, but Konrad asked to
> make a patch on top depending on the qcom scm header which has these
> magic hex values with defines.
Sorry if that wasn't clear, but what I meant to ask for is "pick this
patch that will get in soon and add the VMIDs you need on top of it
so that you can send it in parallel and Bjorn can merge both easily"
and had nothing to do with splitting out its inclusion in the dts

Konrad
> I can make the defines as default, no problem. Will do in v5.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Dylan
> 
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
>