From: Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>
To: Danielle Costantino <dcostantino@meta.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, tariqt@nvidia.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
saeedm@nvidia.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5e: Fix validation logic in rate limiting
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 20:37:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cbb5488b-4923-4032-a037-7ff851772a64@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251124180043.2314428-1-dcostantino@meta.com>
On 24/11/2025 20:00, Danielle Costantino wrote:
> The rate limiting validation condition currently checks the output
> variable max_bw_value[i] instead of the input value
> maxrate->tc_maxrate[i]. This causes the validation to compare an
> uninitialized or stale value rather than the actual requested rate.
>
> The condition should check the input rate to properly validate against
> the upper limit:
>
> } else if (maxrate->tc_maxrate[i] <= upper_limit_gbps) {
>
> This aligns with the pattern used in the first branch, which correctly
> checks maxrate->tc_maxrate[i] against upper_limit_mbps.
>
> The current implementation can lead to unreliable validation behavior:
>
> - For rates between 25.5 Gbps and 255 Gbps, if max_bw_value[i] is 0
> from initialization, the GBPS path may be taken regardless of whether
> the actual rate is within bounds
>
> - When processing multiple TCs (i > 0), max_bw_value[i] contains the
> value computed for the previous TC, affecting the validation logic
>
> - The overflow check for rates exceeding 255 Gbps may not trigger
> consistently depending on previous array values
>
> This patch ensures the validation correctly examines the requested rate
> value for proper bounds checking.
>
> Fixes: 43b27d1bd88a ("net/mlx5e: Fix wraparound in rate limiting for values above 255 Gbps")
> Signed-off-by: Danielle Costantino <dcostantino@meta.com>
Thanks Danielle!
Reviewed-by: Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-24 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-24 18:00 Danielle Costantino
2025-11-24 18:37 ` Gal Pressman [this message]
2025-11-26 0:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cbb5488b-4923-4032-a037-7ff851772a64@nvidia.com \
--to=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=dcostantino@meta.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®