mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
	ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, 	andrii@kernel.org,
	eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com, mingo@redhat.com,
		peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org,  akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	david@kernel.org, gourry@gourry.net, tj@kernel.org,
		hannes@cmpxchg.org, mkoutny@suse.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
		roman.gushchin@linux.dev, yu.c.chen@intel.com,
	zhao1.liu@intel.com, 	lizhe.67@bytedance.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 bpf-next 1/5] sched: fix stale get_pref_llc() stub for !CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 13:40:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cbf93381e02861620b012ace93c816f2c0822fea.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261019064157.29885-2-laoar.shao@gmail.com>

On Mon, 2026-10-19 at 14:41 +0800, Yafang Shao wrote:
> Commit b636fef85bda ("sched/cache: Introduce task_struct->sched_cache_grp
> to fix UAF") switched get_pref_llc() from taking a struct mm_struct * to
> taking the task's struct sched_cache_group *, but only updated the
> CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE definition and its caller: the stub in the
> !CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE branch kept the old mm_struct parameter.
> 
> Fixes: b636fef85bda ("sched/cache: Introduce task_struct->sched_cache_grp to fix UAF")

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #v7.2.x

> Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 57360f5cdde4..973647ad6c2d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -2194,7 +2194,7 @@ void init_sched_mm(struct task_struct *p) { }
>  static void task_tick_cache(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) { }
>  
>  static inline int get_pref_llc(struct task_struct *p,
> -			       struct mm_struct *mm)
> +			       struct sched_cache_group *grp)
>  {
>  	return -1;
>  }

Thanks for catching it.

Should be backported to 7.2.x kernel as commit b636fef85bda
that this patch fixes has been backported to stable.

Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>

Tim

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-21 20:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-19  6:41 [RFC PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/5] BPF-based per-cgroup NUMA balancing mode selection Yafang Shao
2026-10-19  6:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 bpf-next 1/5] sched: fix stale get_pref_llc() stub for !CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE Yafang Shao
2026-10-21  2:23   ` Gregory Price (Meta)
2026-10-21  5:46     ` Yafang Shao
2026-10-21  2:40   ` Chen Yu
2026-10-21 20:40   ` Tim Chen [this message]
2026-10-19  6:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 bpf-next 2/5] sched: use static_branch_likely() for the NUMA balancing tick check Yafang Shao
2026-10-21  2:26   ` Gregory Price (Meta)
2026-10-19  6:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 bpf-next 3/5] sched: add helpers for numa balancing Yafang Shao
2026-10-19  7:14   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-19  6:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/5] sched: add BPF-based per-cgroup NUMA balancing mode selection Yafang Shao
2026-10-19  7:24   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-19  6:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: add tests for the numab kfuncs Yafang Shao
2026-10-20 16:54 ` [RFC PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/5] BPF-based per-cgroup NUMA balancing mode selection Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cbf93381e02861620b012ace93c816f2c0822fea.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizhe.67@bytedance.com \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®