From: "zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
To: Jari Ruusu <jari.ruusu@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ext3 file system livelock and file system corruption, 4.9.166 stable kernel
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 21:06:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc23b5a8-64b9-63d4-c805-ae25c5b1bcad@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACMCwJ+qLHV+cjQC2kAnLQP6qVz1bJ75V8BqQBV5HE1edRC-AQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jari,
Sorry about introduce this livelocks bug. The patch 674a2b272 ("ext4:
brelse all indirect buffer in ext4_ind_remove_space()") want to fix a
buffer leak problem. The follow-up patch 5e86bdda415 ("ext4: cleanup
bh release code in ext4_ind_remove_space()") was just want to do some
cleanup stuff originally, it was seperate from the first patch [*] in
the v2 iteration. But I forget to do decrease the partial and partial2
pointers in the first patch when doing seperate job, sorry again.
Fortunately, the second patch can fix the livelocks bug, so the upstream
is fine.
Hi Greg, backport the second cleanup patch can fix the bug, or I can
post a individual fix patch if you want.
Thanks,
Yi.
[*] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg64668.html
On 2019/4/2 18:08, Jari Ruusu Wrote:
> To trigger this ext4 file system bug, you need a sparse file with
> correct sparse pattern on old-school ext3 file system. I tried
> more simpler ways to trigger this but those attempts did not
> trigger the bug. I have provided compressed sparse file that
> reliably triggers the bug. Size of compressed sparse file 1667256
> bytes. Size of uncompressed sparse file 7369850880 bytes.
> Following commands will demo the problem.
>
> wget http://www.elisanet.fi/jariruusu/123/sparse-demo.data.xz
> xz -d sparse-demo.data.xz
> mkfs -t ext3 -b 4096 -e remount-ro -O "^dir_index" /dev/sdc1
> mount -t ext3 /dev/sdc1 /mnt
> cp -v --sparse=always sparse-demo.data /mnt/aa
> cp -v --sparse=always sparse-demo.data /mnt/bb
> umount /mnt
> mount -t ext3 /dev/sdc1 /mnt
> cp -v --sparse=always /mnt/bb /mnt/aa
>
> That last cp command reliably triggers the bug that livelocks and
> after reset you have file system corruption to deal with. Deeply
> unfunny.
>
> The bug is caused by
> "ext4: brelse all indirect buffer in ext4_ind_remove_space()"
> upstream commit 674a2b27234d1b7afcb0a9162e81b2e53aeef217, from
> <yi.zhang@huawei.com>, who provided a follow-up patch
> "ext4: cleanup bh release code in ext4_ind_remove_space()"
> upstream commit 5e86bdda41534e17621d5a071b294943cae4376e. The
> problem with that follow-up patch is that it is almost criminally
> mislabeled. It should have said "fixes ext3 livelock and file
> system corrupting bug" or something like that, so that Greg KH &
> Co would have understood that it must be backported to stable
> kernels too. Now the bug appears to be in all/most stable kernels
> already.
>
> Below is the buggy patch that causes the problem. Look at those
> new while loops. Once the while condition is true once, it is
> ALWAYS true, so it livelocks.
>
>> --- a/fs/ext4/indirect.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/indirect.c
>> @@ -1385,10 +1385,14 @@ end_range:
>> partial->p + 1,
>> partial2->p,
>> (chain+n-1) - partial);
>> - BUFFER_TRACE(partial->bh, "call brelse");
>> - brelse(partial->bh);
>> - BUFFER_TRACE(partial2->bh, "call brelse");
>> - brelse(partial2->bh);
>> + while (partial > chain) {
>> + BUFFER_TRACE(partial->bh, "call brelse");
>> + brelse(partial->bh);
>> + }
>> + while (partial2 > chain2) {
>> + BUFFER_TRACE(partial2->bh, "call brelse");
>> + brelse(partial2->bh);
>> + }
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>
> Greg & Co,
> Please revert that above patch from stable kernels or backport the
> follow-up patch that fixes the problem.
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-02 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-02 10:08 Jari Ruusu
2019-04-02 10:35 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-04-02 15:10 ` Jan Kara
2019-04-02 16:15 ` Theodore Ts'o
2019-04-03 13:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-04-02 13:06 ` zhangyi (F) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cc23b5a8-64b9-63d4-c805-ae25c5b1bcad@huawei.com \
--to=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jari.ruusu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®