From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: dan.carpenter@oracle.com, david.laight@aculab.com,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/20] staging: rtl8723bs: put parentheses on macros with complex values in include/rtw_debug.h
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 01:39:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc86b15eb81f55ce69da3b1169a083dc7ce9d85c.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f36448ddc1553a018f700983b5d436eacaef9cb3.1616854134.git.fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>
On Sat, 2021-03-27 at 15:24 +0100, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> fix the following checkpatch warning:
>
> ERROR: Macros starting with if should be enclosed by a
> do - while loop to avoid possible if/else logic defects
> + #define RT_PRINT_DATA(_Comp, _Level,
> _TitleString, _HexData, _HexDataLen) \
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>
It's good to use checkpatch as a guide to improve code, but this
particular code is just a mess to begin with and it makes a
complete mess of the the dmesg log if it's actually enabled.
Try substituting print_hex_dump_debug for this instead.
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_debug.h | 28 ++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_debug.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_debug.h
> index d1c557818305..b00f8a6c4312 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_debug.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_debug.h
> @@ -236,19 +236,21 @@
> #if defined(_dbgdump)
> #undef RT_PRINT_DATA
> #define RT_PRINT_DATA(_Comp, _Level, _TitleString, _HexData, _HexDataLen) \
> - if (((_Comp) & GlobalDebugComponents) && (_Level <= GlobalDebugLevel)) \
> - { \
> - int __i; \
> - u8 *ptr = (u8 *)_HexData; \
> - _dbgdump("%s", DRIVER_PREFIX); \
> - _dbgdump(_TitleString); \
> - for (__i = 0; __i < (int)_HexDataLen; __i++) \
> - { \
> - _dbgdump("%02X%s", ptr[__i], (((__i + 1) % 4) == 0)?" ":" "); \
> - if (((__i + 1) % 16) == 0) _dbgdump("\n"); \
> - } \
> - _dbgdump("\n"); \
> - }
> + do { \
> + if (((_Comp) & GlobalDebugComponents) && (_Level <= GlobalDebugLevel)) \
> + { \
> + int __i; \
> + u8 *ptr = (u8 *)_HexData; \
> + _dbgdump("%s", DRIVER_PREFIX); \
> + _dbgdump(_TitleString); \
> + for (__i = 0; __i < (int)_HexDataLen; __i++) \
> + { \
> + _dbgdump("%02X%s", ptr[__i], (((__i + 1) % 4) == 0)?" ":" "); \
> + if (((__i + 1) % 16) == 0) _dbgdump("\n"); \
> + } \
> + _dbgdump("\n"); \
> + } \
> + } while (0)
> #endif /* defined(_dbgdump) */
> #endif /* DEBUG_RTL871X */
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-28 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-27 14:23 [PATCH v2 00/20] fix checkpatch error on macros Fabio Aiuto
2021-03-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused macros in include/hal_com.h Fabio Aiuto
2021-03-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] staging: rtl8723bs: put parentheses on macro with complex values " Fabio Aiuto
2021-03-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 03/20] staging: rtl8723bs: added spaces around operators in a macro " Fabio Aiuto
2021-03-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused macros in include/hal_com_reg.h Fabio Aiuto
2021-03-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused macros in include/hal_data.h Fabio Aiuto
2021-03-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 06/20] staging: rtl8723bs: put parentheses on macros with complex values " Fabio Aiuto
2021-03-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 07/20] staging: rtl8723bs: add spaces around operators " Fabio Aiuto
2021-03-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused macros in include/hal_phy.h Fabio Aiuto
2021-03-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 09/20] staging: rtl8723bs: put parentheses on macros with complex values in include/rtw_debug.h Fabio Aiuto
2021-03-28 8:39 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2021-03-28 12:08 ` Greg KH
2021-03-28 14:43 ` Fabio Aiuto
2021-03-28 14:54 ` Greg KH
2021-03-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused macro in include/rtw_pwrctrl.h Fabio Aiuto
2021-03-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused field in rereg_nd_name_data struct Fabio Aiuto
2021-03-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] staging: rtl8723bs: remove commented code line in os_dep/ioctl_linux.c Fabio Aiuto
2021-03-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 13/20] staging: rtl8723bs: put parentheses on macros with complex values in include/rtw_pwrctrl.h Fabio Aiuto
2021-03-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] staging: rtl8723bs: add spaces around operator " Fabio Aiuto
2021-03-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused macros in include/wifi.h Fabio Aiuto
2021-03-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 16/20] staging: rtl8723bs: put parentheses on macros with complex values " Fabio Aiuto
2021-03-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 17/20] staging: rtl8723bs: remove macros updating unused fields in struct security_priv Fabio Aiuto
2021-03-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 18/20] staging: rtl8723bs: remove " Fabio Aiuto
2021-03-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 19/20] staging: rtl8723bs: include macro in a do - while loop in core/rtw_security.c Fabio Aiuto
2021-03-28 12:10 ` Greg KH
2021-03-28 14:23 ` Fabio Aiuto
2021-03-27 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 20/20] staging: rtl8723bs: remove unused macros in include/drv_types.c Fabio Aiuto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cc86b15eb81f55ce69da3b1169a083dc7ce9d85c.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=fabioaiuto83@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®