mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	keith.busch@intel.com, josef@toxicpanda.com,
	ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] nvme: use __blk_mq_complete_request in timeout path
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:40:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc93effe-8e97-d4a8-851e-33208cf837a7@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1817441e-6810-ed40-a8fd-403742818aae@grimberg.me>



On 06/25/2018 02:07 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> 
>> Hi Christoph
>>
>> Thanks for your kindly response.
>>
>> On 06/20/2018 10:39 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
>>>> index 73a97fc..2a161f6 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
>>>> @@ -1203,6 +1203,7 @@ static enum blk_eh_timer_return nvme_timeout(struct request *req, bool reserved)
>>>>           nvme_warn_reset(dev, csts);
>>>>           nvme_dev_disable(dev, false);
>>>>           nvme_reset_ctrl(&dev->ctrl);
>>>> +        __blk_mq_complete_request(req);
>>>>           return BLK_EH_DONE;
>>>>       }
>>>>   @@ -1213,6 +1214,11 @@ static enum blk_eh_timer_return nvme_timeout(struct request *req, bool reserved)
>>>>           dev_warn(dev->ctrl.device,
>>>>                "I/O %d QID %d timeout, completion polled\n",
>>>>                req->tag, nvmeq->qid);
>>>> +        /*
>>>> +         * nvme_end_request will invoke blk_mq_complete_request,
>>>> +         * it will do nothing for this timed out request.
>>>> +         */
>>>> +        __blk_mq_complete_request(req);
>>>
>>> And this clearly is bogus.  We want to iterate over the tagetset
>>> and cancel all requests, not do that manually here.
>>>
>>> That was the whole point of the original change.
>>>
>>
>> For nvme-pci, we indeed have an issue that when nvme_reset_work->nvme_dev_disable returns, timeout path maybe still
>> running and the nvme_dev_disable invoked by timeout path will race with the nvme_reset_work.
>> However, the hole is still there right now w/o my changes, but just narrower.
> 
> Given the amount of fixes (and fixes of fixes) we had in the timeout handler, maybe it'd be a good idea to step back and take a another look?
> 
> Won't it be better to avoid disabling the device and return
> BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER if we are not aborting in the timeout handler?
> 

Yes, that would be an ideal status for nvme-pci.
But we have to depend on the timeout handler to handle the timed out request from nvme_reset_work.

Thanks
Jianchao

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-25  1:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-20 13:22 [PATCH 0/5]stop normal completion path entering a timeout req Jianchao Wang
2018-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH 1/5] blk-mq: prevent normal completion from entering a timeout request Jianchao Wang
2018-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] nbd: use __blk_mq_complete_request in timeout path Jianchao Wang
2018-06-20 14:13   ` Josef Bacik
2018-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH 3/5] null_blk: " Jianchao Wang
2018-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] mmc: " Jianchao Wang
2018-06-20 13:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] nvme: " Jianchao Wang
2018-06-20 14:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-21  2:09     ` jianchao.wang
2018-06-24 18:07       ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-06-25  1:40         ` jianchao.wang [this message]
2018-06-25 18:51           ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-06-20 18:16 ` [PATCH 0/5]stop normal completion path entering a timeout req Keith Busch
2018-06-21  1:43   ` jianchao.wang
2018-06-21  8:19     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-21  8:22       ` jianchao.wang
2018-06-22 15:10         ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-25  1:29           ` jianchao.wang
2018-06-21 13:13       ` jianchao.wang
2018-06-21 15:01         ` Keith Busch
2018-06-21 18:21       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-06-21 21:15         ` Keith Busch
2018-06-21 21:30           ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cc93effe-8e97-d4a8-851e-33208cf837a7@oracle.com \
    --to=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®