From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751635AbdATJzz (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2017 04:55:55 -0500 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([58.251.152.64]:35153 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751555AbdATJzy (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2017 04:55:54 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC] HWPOISON: soft offlining for non-lru movable page To: Naoya Horiguchi References: <1484712054-7997-1-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawei.com> <20170118094530.GA29579@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> CC: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "mhocko@suse.com" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "minchan@kernel.org" , "vbabka@suse.cz" , "guohanjun@huawei.com" , "qiuxishi@huawei.com" From: Yisheng Xie Message-ID: Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 17:52:13 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170118094530.GA29579@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.29.40] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020203.5881DDE0.02FA,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: aaac19ff4e2eb89774b1c73fbd9b0b3a Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Naoya, On 2017/1/18 17:45, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:00:54PM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote: >> This patch is to extends soft offlining framework to support >> non-lru page, which already support migration after >> commit bda807d44454 ("mm: migrate: support non-lru movable page >> migration") >> >> When memory corrected errors occur on a non-lru movable page, >> we can choose to stop using it by migrating data onto another >> page and disable the original (maybe half-broken) one. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yisheng Xie > > It looks OK in my quick glance. I'll do some testing more tomorrow. > Thanks for reviewing. I have do some basic test like offline movable page and unpoison it. Do you have some test suit or test suggestion? So I can do some more test of it for double check? Very thanks for that. Thanks Yisheng Xie. >