Re: [PATCH] Revert "base: arch_topology: fix section mismatch build warnings"

[Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>]

On 07/02/18 08:32, Gaku Inami wrote:
> This reverts commit 452562abb5b7 ("base: arch_topology: fix section
> mismatch build warnings"). It causes the notifier call hangs in some
> use-cases.
> 
> In some cases with using maxcpus, some of cpus are booted first and
> then the remaining cpus are booted. As an example, some users who want
> to realize fast boot up often use the following procedure.
> 
>   1) Define all CPUs on device tree (CA57x4 + CA53x4)
>   2) Add "maxcpus=4" in bootargs
>   3) Kernel boot up with CA57x4
>   4) After kernel boot up, CA53x4 is booted from user
> 
> When kernel init was finished, CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER was not still
> unregisterd. This means that "__init init_cpu_capacity_callback()"
> will be called after kernel init sequence. To avoid this problem,
> it needs to remove __init{,data} annotations by reverting this commit.
> 
> Also, this commit was needed to fix kernel compile issue below.
> However, this issue was also fixed by another patch: commit 82d8ba717ccb
> ("arch_topology: Fix section miss match warning due to
> free_raw_capacity()") in v4.15 as well.
> Whereas commit 452562abb5b7 added all the missing __init annotations,
> commit 82d8ba717ccb removed it from free_raw_capacity().
> 

Ah I see commit 82d8ba717ccb made the commit 452562abb5b7 redundant
by removing the __init. Both attempt to solve the same problem in
different ways :)

Can you please add the the tag, so that it gets picked up accordingly ?

Fixes: 82d8ba717ccb ("arch_topology: Fix section miss match warning due
to free_raw_capacity()")


FWIW,

Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x548f24): Section mismatch in reference
> from the function init_cpu_capacity_callback() to the variable
> .init.text:$x
> The function init_cpu_capacity_callback() references
> the variable __init $x.
> This is often because init_cpu_capacity_callback lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of $x is wrong.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gaku Inami <gaku.inami.xh@renesas.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> index 4de87b0..8bfd498 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> @@ -175,11 +175,11 @@ bool __init topology_parse_cpu_capacity(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu)
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
> -static cpumask_var_t cpus_to_visit __initdata;
> -static void __init parsing_done_workfn(struct work_struct *work);
> -static __initdata DECLARE_WORK(parsing_done_work, parsing_done_workfn);
> +static cpumask_var_t cpus_to_visit;
> +static void parsing_done_workfn(struct work_struct *work);
> +static DECLARE_WORK(parsing_done_work, parsing_done_workfn);
>  
> -static int __init
> +static int
>  init_cpu_capacity_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
>  			   unsigned long val,
>  			   void *data)
> @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ init_cpu_capacity_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static struct notifier_block init_cpu_capacity_notifier __initdata = {
> +static struct notifier_block init_cpu_capacity_notifier = {
>  	.notifier_call = init_cpu_capacity_callback,
>  };
>  
> @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static int __init register_cpufreq_notifier(void)
>  }
>  core_initcall(register_cpufreq_notifier);
>  
> -static void __init parsing_done_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
> +static void parsing_done_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&init_cpu_capacity_notifier,
>  					 CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER);
> 

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep