From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: "zhaoyang.huang" <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>,
steve.kang@unisoc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] block: adjust CFS request expire time
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:12:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd332ec7-2e29-419a-87a4-e32852ad96e7@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240220114536.513494-1-zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
Where is patch 1/2 of this series? I don't see it in my mailbox.
On 2/20/24 03:45, zhaoyang.huang wrote:
> From: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
>
> According to current policy, CFS's may suffer involuntary IO-latency by
Did you perhaps mean "cause" instead of "suffer"?
> being preempted by RT/DL tasks or IRQ.
For which workloads? Sequential I/O or random I/O? If it is for random I/O,
please take a look at patch "scsi: ufs: core: Add CPU latency QoS support
for UFS driver"
(https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231219123706.6463-1-quic_mnaresh@quicinc.com/)
and let us know whether or not the Power Management Quality of Service (PM QoS)
framework is perhaps a better solution.
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-20 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-20 11:45 zhaoyang.huang
2024-02-20 11:56 ` Zhaoyang Huang
2024-02-20 17:12 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2024-02-22 9:22 [PATCHv2 1/2] sched: introduce helper function to calculate distribution over sched class zhaoyang.huang
2024-02-22 9:22 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] block: adjust CFS request expire time zhaoyang.huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cd332ec7-2e29-419a-87a4-e32852ad96e7@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=huangzhaoyang@gmail.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=steve.kang@unisoc.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®