From: Wilfred Mallawa <wilfred.opensource@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 1/2] net/tls: support setting the maximum payload size
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 12:11:11 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd557c5b11b04da060f07d3849dc46e7b3625ed1.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251023184404.4dd617f0@kernel.org>
On Thu, 2025-10-23 at 18:44 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 10:19:36 +1000 Wilfred Mallawa wrote:
> > +TLS_TX_MAX_PAYLOAD_LEN
> > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > +
> > +Specifies the maximum size of the plaintext payload for
> > transmitted TLS records.
> > +
> > +When this option is set, the kernel enforces the specified limit
> > on all outgoing
> > +TLS records. No plaintext fragment will exceed this size. This
> > option can be used
> > +to implement the TLS Record Size Limit extension [1].
> > +
> > +* For TLS 1.2, the value corresponds directly to the record size
> > limit.
> > +* For TLS 1.3, the value should be set to record_size_limit - 1,
> > since
> > + the record size limit includes one additional byte for the
> > ContentType
> > + field.
> > +
> > +The valid range for this option is 64 to 16384 bytes for TLS 1.2,
> > and 63 to
> > +16384 bytes for TLS 1.3. The lower minimum for TLS 1.3 accounts
> > for the
> > +extra byte used by the ContentType field.
> > +
> > +[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8449
>
> Sorry for not paying attention to the last few revisions.
>
> So we decided to go with the non-RFC definition of the sockopt
> parameter? Is there a reason for that? I like how the "per RFC"
> behavior shifts any blame away from us :)
>
Hey Jakub,
We've made the change from record_size_limit to max_payload_len mainly
because:
In the previous record_size_limit approach for TLS 1.3, we need to
account for the ContentType byte. Which complicates get/setsockopt()
and tls_get_info(), where in setsockopt() for TLS 1.3 we need to
subtract 1 to the user provided value and in getsockopt() we need add 1
to keep the symmetry between the two (similarly in tls_get_info()). The
underlying assumption was that userspace passes up directly what the
endpoint specified as the record_size_limit.
With this approach we don't need to worry about it and we can pass the
responsibility to user-space as documented, which I think makes the
kernel code simpler.
> > + err = nla_put_u16(skb, TLS_INFO_TX_MAX_PAYLOAD_LEN,
> > + ctx->tx_max_payload_len);
> > +
>
> nit: unnecessary empty line
Ah! will fixup for V9
Regards,
Wilfred
>
> > + if (err)
> > + goto nla_failure;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-24 2:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-22 0:19 Wilfred Mallawa
2025-10-22 0:19 ` [PATCH net-next v8 2/2] selftests: tls: add tls record_size_limit test Wilfred Mallawa
2025-10-22 21:51 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-10-22 21:51 ` [PATCH net-next v8 1/2] net/tls: support setting the maximum payload size Sabrina Dubroca
2025-10-24 1:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-24 2:11 ` Wilfred Mallawa [this message]
2025-10-24 23:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-26 8:50 ` Wilfred Mallawa
2025-10-27 11:32 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-10-27 23:13 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-27 23:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cd557c5b11b04da060f07d3849dc46e7b3625ed1.camel@gmail.com \
--to=wilfred.opensource@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®