From: "NG, TZE YEE" <tze.yee.ng@altera.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>, Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org>,
Richard Gong <richard.gong@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"NG, ADRIAN HO YIN" <adrian.ho.yin.ng@altera.com>,
"Nazle Asmade,
Muhammad Nazim Amirul"
<muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade@altera.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: stratix10-svc: fix memory leaks and list corruption bugs
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 03:43:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd67d081-8d0a-4e87-a3c5-3fa94e075503@altera.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026061051-seismic-lyricism-7b77@gregkh>
On 10/6/2026 2:07 pm, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 01:47:44AM +0000, NG, TZE YEE wrote:
>> On 9/6/2026 6:13 pm, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> [Some people who received this message don't often get email from gregkh@linuxfoundation.org. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 02:19:44AM -0700, tze.yee.ng@altera.com wrote:
>>>> From: Tze Yee Ng <tze.yee.ng@altera.com>
>>>>
>>>> Fix a memory leak when gen_pool_alloc() fails by freeing pmem on the error
>>>> path. Switch pmem allocation from devm_kzalloc() to kzalloc() with
>>>> explicit kfree() in the free path to match its list-managed life time.
>>>> Remove the erroneous list_del(&svc_data_mem) which corrupted the list head
>>>> on failed lookups. Add NULL guards instratix10_svc_free_memory().
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 7ca5ce896524 ("firmware: add Intel Stratix10 service layer driver")
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tze Yee Ng <tze.yee.ng@altera.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c | 12 ++++++++----
>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c b/drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c
>>>> index 1ef65bf845fc..3b0e2b14180f 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/stratix10-svc.c
>>>> @@ -1912,14 +1912,16 @@ void *stratix10_svc_allocate_memory(struct stratix10_svc_chan *chan,
>>>> struct gen_pool *genpool = chan->ctrl->genpool;
>>>> size_t s = roundup(size, 1 << genpool->min_alloc_order);
>>>>
>>>> - pmem = devm_kzalloc(chan->ctrl->dev, sizeof(*pmem), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + pmem = kzalloc_obj(*pmem);
>>>> if (!pmem)
>>>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>>>
>>>> guard(mutex)(&svc_mem_lock);
>>>> va = gen_pool_alloc(genpool, s);
>>>> - if (!va)
>>>> + if (!va) {
>>>> + kfree(pmem);
>>>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> memset((void *)va, 0, s);
>>>> pa = gen_pool_virt_to_phys(genpool, va);
>>>> @@ -1945,6 +1947,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stratix10_svc_allocate_memory);
>>>> void stratix10_svc_free_memory(struct stratix10_svc_chan *chan, void *kaddr)
>>>> {
>>>> struct stratix10_svc_data_mem *pmem;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!chan || !kaddr)
>>>> + return;
>>>
>>> What if one is not NULL but the other is? Will you not leak memory here
>>> now?
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> Good catch on the asymmetric case. The guard is not meant to support
>> callers passing one NULL and one non-NULL argument.
>>
>> kaddr == NULL: no-op, nothing to free. The guard prevents the old bug
>> where a failed lookup fell through to list_del(&svc_data_mem) and
>> corrupted the list head.
>>
>> chan == NULL with valid kaddr: would leak, but that is invalid API
>> usage. The previous code would oops on chan->ctrl->genpool instead of
>> freeing. In-tree callers always pass both valid pointers from
>> stratix10_svc_allocate_memory().
>>
>> If you prefer not to silently swallow misuse, I can change this to
>> WARN_ON_ONCE(!chan || !kaddr) before returning, or drop the !chan check
>> and only guard !kaddr so a NULL channel still faults on dereference per
>> normal kernel API expectations.
>
> WARN_ON() will panic a box if it ever triggers, loosing all data, so
> please do not do that. If this is something that can happen, handle it
> properly, don't just crash.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi Greg,
Thanks for the review.
I went through the code again. There are already checks for both kaddr
and chan to guard against invalid API use. The !chan check is mainly a
failsafe in case a caller misuses the API.
Regarding WARN_ON(), thanks for catching that — I had added it to flag
the !chan case. Would it be acceptable if I split the checks into two
conditions and only warn on !chan?
if (!chan) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(!chan);
return;
}
if (!kaddr)
return;
Thanks,
Tze Yee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-12 3:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 9:19 tze.yee.ng
2026-06-09 10:11 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-06-09 10:13 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-06-10 1:47 ` NG, TZE YEE
2026-06-10 6:07 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-06-12 3:43 ` NG, TZE YEE [this message]
2026-06-12 7:54 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-06-19 3:45 ` NG, TZE YEE
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cd67d081-8d0a-4e87-a3c5-3fa94e075503@altera.com \
--to=tze.yee.ng@altera.com \
--cc=adrian.ho.yin.ng@altera.com \
--cc=atull@kernel.org \
--cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade@altera.com \
--cc=richard.gong@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome