From: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Hugues Fruchet <hugues.fruchet@st.com>,
Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rpmsg: Solve circular dependencies involving RPMSG_VIRTIO
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 18:16:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd9cc4ad-0f2c-ecb4-cf9d-010717439c4c@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170627214712.GM18666@tuxbook>
Hi Bjorn,
>>>> Thanks for the patch.
>>
>> On 06/27/2017 01:43 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> While it's very common to use RPMSG for communicating with firmware
>>> running on these remoteprocs there is no functional dependency on RPMSG.
>>
>> This is not entirely accurate though. RPMSG is the IPC transport on
>> these remoteprocs, you seem to suggest that there are alternatives for
>> these remoteprocs. Without RPMSG, you can boot, but you will not be able
>> to talk to the remoteprocs, so I would call it a functional dependency.
>>
>
> IMHO this functional dependency is not from the remoteproc driver but
> your system (and firmware) design. It should be possible to write
> firmware that exposes any other type of virtio device.
You may want to add this clarification to your commit description then.
>
>>> As such RPMSG should be selected by the system integrator and not
>>> automatically by the remoteproc drivers.
>>>
>>> This does solve problems reported with circular Kconfig dependencies for
>>> Davinci and Keystone remoteproc drivers.
>>
>> The Keystone one issue shows up on linux-next (and not on 4.12-rcX) due
>> to the differing options on RESET_CONTROLLER on VIDEO_QCOM_VENUS
>> (through QCOM_SCOM).
>
> That's probably why I didn't see this when build testing before pushing
> this.
>
>> This can also be resolved by changing the depends on RESET_CONTROLLER
>> to a select RESET_CONTROLLER or dropping the line.
>>
>
> Except that this would violate the general rule of "don't use 'select'
> for user-selectable options".
Yeah well, there seems to all sorts of usage w.r.t RESET_CONTROLLER and
VIRTIO. And if the ARCHs enable the ARCH_HAS_RESET_CONTROLLER, the
RESET_CONTROLLER dependencies are not even needed.
A quick grep on 4.12-rc7 yielded 20 occurrences that uses depends on and
21 for selects RESET_CONTROLLER. Similar numbers on VIRTIO are 9 and 9
(with a split between different VIRTIO drivers even).
>
>> The davinci one is tricky though, as I did change it from using a select
>> to a depends on dependency, and obviously ppc64_defconfig is something
>> that I would not check.
Posted a cleanup series that removes the VIRTUALIZATION dependency from
REMOTEPROC and RPMSG_VIRTIO options, the latter fixes the
ppc64_defconfig issue with davinci remoteproc.
>>
>
> While I hate the process of figuring out and enable all the dependencies
> to be able to enable a particular config, this change does reduce the
> risk of running into more of these cyclic dependencies.
>
>> This patch definitely resolves both issues, but it is not obvious that
>> someone would also have to enable RPMSG_VIRTIO to have these remoteprocs
>> useful when looking at either of the menuconfig help.
>>
>
> This is a common issue we have with config options and while I hate to
> add another item to the list of things that you can miss in your system
> configuration I would prefer that my Kconfig is maintainable.
>
> This also means that most remoteproc drivers should "depends on MAILBOX"
> and not select either the framework or the specific drivers. But let's
> try to ignore that until after the merge window.
Yeah ok, as long as you follow a consistent rule across all
remoteproc/rpmsg drivers, that's fine. In fact, other than RPMSG_VIRTIO,
the two drivers I added for this merge window do use/switches to a
depends on convention.
regards
Suman
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-27 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-27 6:43 Bjorn Andersson
2017-06-27 7:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-06-27 19:08 ` Suman Anna
2017-06-27 21:47 ` Bjorn Andersson
2017-06-27 23:16 ` Suman Anna [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cd9cc4ad-0f2c-ecb4-cf9d-010717439c4c@ti.com \
--to=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=hugues.fruchet@st.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.pallardy@st.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=peter.griffin@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®