From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA16DC43387 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 17:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8872054F for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 17:48:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1545500880; bh=MvcRrZ5Vx+OmZeYyfaIm8JfWG3AWxslBL1Iq393xUXU=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=LAnvCui+4A+LlfBo8ENVYfzuebdLmvezJEzYZbFSPlQpgCGSU7oO7Gs7jWIWYwk3s 8uslZq/6NEmNWmUgnmQl/qyTLLOi+3rk3piGCVTguMj7VQ1EF6uE44uxlkcRTOmny/ O5HUK7V95vA7QsnVnMrJDFEEY6liqYQMDcFIgcUY= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2404534AbeLVRr7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Dec 2018 12:47:59 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34184 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2391420AbeLVRrP (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Dec 2018 12:47:15 -0500 Received: from [192.168.43.85] (unknown [5.92.228.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1A9B21972; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 08:34:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1545467702; bh=MvcRrZ5Vx+OmZeYyfaIm8JfWG3AWxslBL1Iq393xUXU=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=QvqAnZZEqZC64podMAOn7oqGM+HhsYRFbGbEmnla0d8VIMVGgVwpKhvgHlDiwNUow fNYZdQsRHxoYizYg7C4tG3Zb1xtr1/1o/p9tHtnTyLw0CSqDaC5TcEm0cRM/l77dPR WFATc7LvXYSHKsgx7L6/qj35ZbbxvjeLw9XU3zAg= Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 08/11] ASoC: Intel: Make PCI dependency explicit To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , ACPI Devel Mailing List , Pierre-Louis Bossart , Liam Girdwood , Jie Yang , Mark Brown , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , "moderated list:INTEL ASoC DRIVERS" , open list References: <20181222001452.7474-1-okaya@kernel.org> <20181222001452.7474-9-okaya@kernel.org> From: Sinan Kaya Message-ID: Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 09:34:57 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/22/2018 7:26 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 4:19 AM Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 12/21/18 4:14 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote: >>> IOSF_MBI driver depends on CONFIG_PCI set but this is not specified >>> anywhere. >> wrong patch description...? > Not really... > Code does unconditional select for IOSF_MBI. > I'll put the above comment into the commit message to make this change cleaner.