mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@st.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
	"linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>,
	Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>,
	Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/7] remoteproc: add warning on resource table cast
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 20:48:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cdcc435066ff48aebc9b02e7e0b13c8f@SFHDAG7NODE2.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a25Y3y1Zjtf18i6Tgt83npLvbCeBvcd-r1+u8ijp=X2Yw@mail.gmail.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Sent: vendredi 30 novembre 2018 15:33
> To: Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@st.com>
> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>; Ohad Ben-Cohen
> <ohad@wizery.com>; linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org; Linux Kernel
> Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Arnaud POULIQUEN
> <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>; Benjamin Gaignard
> <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>; Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] remoteproc: add warning on resource table cast
> 
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:31 PM Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com> wrote:
> >
> > Today resource table supports only 32bit address fields.
> > This is not compliant with 64bit platform for which addresses
> > are cast in 32bit.
> > This patch adds warn messages when address cast is done.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 8 ++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > index 18a1bbf820c9..61c954bd695e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > @@ -772,6 +772,10 @@ static int rproc_alloc_carveout(struct rproc *rproc,
> >                 dev_dbg(dev, "carveout mapped 0x%x to %pad\n",
> >                         mem->da, &dma);
> >         } else {
> > +               /* Update device address as undefined by requester */
> > +               if (sizeof(dma_addr_t) > sizeof(u32))
> > +                       dev_warn(dev, "DMA address cast in 32bit to fit resource table
> format\n");
> > +
> >                 mem->da = (u32)dma;
> >         }
> 
> I think this patch is wrong: sizeof(dma_addr_t) is defined to be large enough
> to support any machine that the kernel can run on. If you build a kernel that
> happens to work on an ARM32 platform with LPAE enabled, then this will
> warn every time, even if you are running on a machine that only has a 32-bit
> address space.

I suppose if LPAE is enabled, address space is larger than 32bit.
But I agree it is possible to display a warn only when some information will be lost
due to cast.
I'll propose a new version testing dma address itself and displaying warn only if above 4GB.

Regards,
Loic
> 
>      Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-30 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-29 21:29 [PATCH 0/7] remoteproc: Fixes for memoy carveout management Loic Pallardy
2018-11-29 21:29 ` [PATCH 1/7] remoteproc: correct rproc_mem_entry_init() comments Loic Pallardy
2018-11-29 21:29 ` [PATCH 2/7] remoteproc: fix rproc_da_to_va in case of unallocated carveout Loic Pallardy
2018-11-29 21:29 ` [PATCH 3/7] remoteproc: fix rproc_alloc_carveout() bad variable cast Loic Pallardy
2018-11-29 21:29 ` [PATCH 4/7] remoteproc: add warning on resource table cast Loic Pallardy
2018-11-30 14:33   ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-11-30 20:48     ` Loic PALLARDY [this message]
2018-11-29 21:29 ` [PATCH 5/7] remoteproc: fix rproc_alloc_carveout() for rproc with iommu domain Loic Pallardy
2018-11-29 21:29 ` [PATCH 6/7] remoteproc: fix trace buffer va initialization Loic Pallardy
2018-12-06 20:37   ` Loic PALLARDY
2018-11-29 21:29 ` [PATCH 7/7] remoteproc: fix rproc_check_carveout_da() returned error and comments Loic Pallardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cdcc435066ff48aebc9b02e7e0b13c8f@SFHDAG7NODE2.st.com \
    --to=loic.pallardy@st.com \
    --cc=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    --cc=s-anna@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®