From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: Tung Quang Nguyen <tung.q.nguyen@dektech.com.au>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>,
Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>, Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net"
<tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org"
<kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] tipc: remove redundant assignment to ret, simplify code
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:31:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce0a63fc-1985-4e25-a08b-c0045ae095f4@moroto.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AS4PR05MB96479D9B6F9EC765371AA8A588052@AS4PR05MB9647.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:04:10AM +0000, Tung Quang Nguyen wrote:
> >
> I suggest that err variable should be completely removed. Could you
> please also do the same thing for this code ?
> "
> ...
> err = skb_handler(skb, cb, tsk);
> if (err) {
If we write the code as:
if (some_function(parameters)) {
then at first that looks like a boolean. People probably think the
function returns true/false. But if we leave it as-is:
err = some_function(parameters);
if (err) {
Then that looks like error handling.
So it's better and more readable to leave it as-is.
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-11 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-11 9:17 Colin Ian King
2024-04-11 10:04 ` Tung Quang Nguyen
2024-04-11 10:31 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2024-04-11 10:43 ` Colin King (gmail)
2024-04-11 11:04 ` Tung Quang Nguyen
2024-04-11 11:27 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-04-11 11:42 ` Tung Quang Nguyen
2024-04-13 2:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ce0a63fc-1985-4e25-a08b-c0045ae095f4@moroto.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=colin.i.king@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jmaloy@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tung.q.nguyen@dektech.com.au \
--cc=ying.xue@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®