From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96D0A1A2C20; Fri, 17 May 2024 21:55:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715982959; cv=none; b=kfC2ZFWQorRhsrnJO+Ezb6VDq1h68LIWJsF3SAHz9+h7qzAk4FAEmB6Y7WpKC2xdYgM9jR3i+CnC0lDC6O3hfBxEXYNFlWox2MdJyxo+RAm7VXNLbC5QG2sZBMbH1dWmGypCF4bYE4Xmony3Ap48wUxfxig4wIyjPVwuQFC+KMg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715982959; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ghGC/qD4YYwRu7VJcfFZKkyW1l1SLUi2sKVi4dYyITU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Sy7la/z3+T7I7zmRMm08rNJGgSO4I7Q5xXsvP7RV19T08wKwMZvi9OA9m8fYEqRgHLeAgvkDfXAMeTUe9IzcdtR8fOryk2jCSrROpsJl0JjlRLEn7gp8CTeNVLemBevZ6XHMkEdVpGGmE1YCHzZOOeTNmDuR8xdkfLyrMDmYUz8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=br3RZU5R; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="br3RZU5R" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB900C2BD10; Fri, 17 May 2024 21:55:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1715982959; bh=ghGC/qD4YYwRu7VJcfFZKkyW1l1SLUi2sKVi4dYyITU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=br3RZU5RKzjPkkHDhTB8a7BD6A+j+/+FAEnnMgM1Bm7UG91jxu350+15IV2VZmNGC TBStr+E8Il/cgwT10FinDZTIsb9r9Ixtrze19b9P73XcXKyYF78p/ze+Wpc4lnktlj JiXS8SvQIYFS5KfbcMws5tGQRzVU0gAhZioL+7rt1ehWug7WEslrZM76+a3gQZGkeI Li7NNgjiXp3K5+5R49z3Wt/VjrCvEUc+vZdSeg2s4mXXXz1/+gEiv1u4iA7OMlq8O/ W5XInYZvDmmOeqIMokgHTV/aHppPS5VyL0N/YNB3SyEHKUQ3ZQokwu1Vt8NjqBagYf yIpV5sfkrDPwA== Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 22:55:55 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] spi: gpio: Make num_chipselect 8-bit in the struct spi_gpio_platform_data Message-ID: References: <20240517194246.747427-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20240517194246.747427-4-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lx1NAW7LWTAVBckq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240517194246.747427-4-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> X-Cookie: Function reject. --lx1NAW7LWTAVBckq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 10:42:03PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > There is no use for whole 16-bit for the number of chip select pins. > Drop it to 8 bits. because...? It's the only field in the struct so it's not like it makes any meaningful different to struct layout. --lx1NAW7LWTAVBckq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmZH0moACgkQJNaLcl1U h9DPZAf+Lqc9Ezwvnd8c3HfCfl8KYyxemvF6LAJrcp/+ZxXZI9AfBNeDIKOrCXQl nTLcrteD3bfQaOfM4Bm8ZpScR5SGlZYKVDqJlevrn3ATSGNZOwW+uwdvgmyNrhaR 6G+UncXMes3ebPUxs4faStgb4SkYAPbD/JVGYIuiN3M4wK4dxgcDO7jHmkiq2LPk OkCvsk2bC16I7ip875hXNHONjT/KP/vrwTKnMxwmj/mi22fWb6hsj1mjLpScQuOG DCRx2iH9LxEDKJaATFWQ8nQv/bw/C9rQzVCw+WKbCdhrzBaZdN+1TwTK68MJ1eMC vGWMOu7gRalV5rcnO8WGhzqQ3/vV2Q== =KR/p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lx1NAW7LWTAVBckq--