From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/xen/64: Rearrange the SYSCALL entries
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 17:39:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce774c83-70df-5188-8a24-61de00a92e8f@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c88ed36805d36841ab03ec3b48b4122c4418d71.1502164668.git.luto@kernel.org>
On 08/08/17 05:59, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Xen's raw SYSCALL entries are much less weird than native. Rather
> than fudging them to look like native entries, use the Xen-provided
> stack frame directly.
>
> This lets us eliminate entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs and two uses of
> the SWAPGS_UNSAFE_STACK paravirt hook. The SYSENTER code would
> benefit from similar treatment.
>
> This makes one change to the native code path: the compat
> instruction that clears the high 32 bits of %rax is moved slightly
> later. I'd be surprised if this affects performance at all.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Thanks,
Juergen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-09 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-08 3:59 Andy Lutomirski
2017-08-09 15:39 ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2017-08-10 12:22 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2017-08-14 2:44 ` [PATCH v2] " Brian Gerst
2017-08-14 5:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-08-14 6:42 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-08-14 6:45 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-08-14 12:46 ` Brian Gerst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ce774c83-70df-5188-8a24-61de00a92e8f@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bpetkov@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®