Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/134] 6.6.5-rc1 review

["Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>]

On Tue, Dec 5, 2023, at 16:53, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 08:51, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.5 release.
>> There are 134 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Dec 2023 03:14:57 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.5-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>
> The x86 allmodconfig with gcc-8 failed but passed with gcc-13.
>
> x86_64: gcc-8-allmodconfig: FAILED
> x86_64: gcc-13-allmodconfig: PASS

Note that at the moment gcc-13 (also 11 and 12) turns off the
 -Warray-bounds checks because of excessive false positives,
see 0da6e5fd6c37 ("gcc: disable '-Warray-bounds' for gcc-13 too").

I have not yet figured out what gcc-8 complains about,
but I assume that gcc-13 would find the same thing with
the check enabled.

   Arnd