mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Linux Portal" <linportal@gmail.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: First benchmarks of the ext4 file system
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:42:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ceccffee0610220542t422647e1of507047f6777649e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061021234923.defbfb1f.akpm@osdl.org>

On 10/22/06, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:57:36 +0200
> "Linux Portal" <linportal@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > ext4 is 20 percent faster writer than ext3 or reiser4, probably thanks
> > to extents and delayed allocation. On other tests it is either
> > slightly faster or slightly slower. reiser4 comes as a nice surprise,
> > winning few benchmarks. Both are very stable, no errors during
> > testing.
> >
> > http://linux.inet.hr/first_benchmarks_of_the_ext4_file_system.html
>
> ext4 doesn't implement delayed allocation (yet).
>
> I made some observations regarding comparative benchmarking of filesystems
> when releasing 2.6.19-rc1-mm1.  They seem to have been ignored ;)  See
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19-rc1/2.6.19-rc1-mm1/announce.txt
>
>

Yeah, and because of this: "Although this doesn't seem to make much
difference with ext3" which is what I observed, too, in some other
benchmarks.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-22 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-21 23:57 Linux Portal
2006-10-22  0:45 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-10-22  6:49 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-22 12:42   ` Linux Portal [this message]
2006-10-23  2:07 ` Theodore Tso
2006-10-23 15:32   ` Linux Portal
2006-10-30  2:37     ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ceccffee0610220542t422647e1of507047f6777649e@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=linportal@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®