From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755929AbcJURyg (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 13:54:36 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f182.google.com ([209.85.192.182]:32779 "EHLO mail-pf0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754385AbcJURye (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 13:54:34 -0400 Reply-To: minyard@acm.org Subject: Re: Pull request for 4.9 for IPMI References: <695505ac-e982-53ba-4c22-dfa85b691e59@acm.org> To: Linus Torvalds Cc: "openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net" , linux-kernel From: Corey Minyard Message-ID: Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:54:30 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/21/2016 12:48 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Corey Minyard wrote: >> This has been in linux-next for a month or so. > Clearly not. It was committed yesterday. > > What the hell is wrong with people? If you had it in linux-next and it > was tested, why did you then send me something else? I rebased it, but that was it. I'll resend the exact version that was in linux-next. -corey > Pulled and then immediately unpulled again, because the "this was > ready but I didn't send it to you because I was on vacation" was a > fine explanation, but then when I actually look at it I notice that it > wasn't actually true. > > Linus