mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Colin Fowler" <elethiomel@gmail.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: Performance loss 2.6.22->22.6.23->2.6.24-rc7 on CPU intensive benchmark on 8 Core Xeon
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:10:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf3edd8d0801160810w4302afa5vd731cc6852c778ba@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080116153505.GB18553@elte.hu>

Hi Ingo, I'll need to convince my supervisor first if I can release a
binary. Technically anythin glike this needs to go through our
University's "innovations department" and requires lengthy paperwork
and NDAs :(.

regards,
        Colin

On Jan 16, 2008 3:35 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> * Colin Fowler <elethiomel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > > and context-switches 45K times a second. Do you know what is going
> > > on there? I thought ray-tracing is something that can be
> > > parallelized pretty efficiently, without having to contend and
> > > schedule too much.
> >
> > This is a RTRT (real-time ray tracing) system and as a result differs
> > from traditional offline ray-tracers as it is optimised for speed. The
> > benchmark I ran while these data were collected renders an 80K polygon
> > scene to a 512x512 buffer at just over 100fps.
> >
> > The context switches are most likely caused by the pthreads
> > synchronisation code. There are two mutexs. Each job is a 32x32 tile
> > and each mutex is therefore unlocked (512/32) * (512/32) * 100 (for
> > 100fps) * 2 =~50k. There's very likely where our context switches are
> > coming from. Larger tile sizes would of course reduce the locking
> > overhead, but then the ray-tracer suffers form load imbalance as some
> > tiles are much quicker to render than others. Empircally we've found
> > that this tile-size works the best for us.
> >
> > The CPU idling occurs as the system doesn't yet perform asynchronous
> > rendering. When all tiles in a current job queue are finished the
> > current frame is done. At this point all worker threads sleep while
> > the master thread blits the image to the screen and fills the job
> > queue for the next frame. The data probably shows that one CPU is kept
> > maxed and the others reach about 90% most of the time. This is
> > something on my TODO list to fix along with a myriad of other
> > optimisations :)
>
> is this something i could run myself and see how it behaves with various
> scheduler settings? (if yes, where can i download it and is there any
> sample scene that would show similar effects.)
>
>         Ingo
>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-16 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-14 17:37 Colin Fowler
2008-01-14 18:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-14 22:42   ` Colin Fowler
2008-01-14 22:43     ` Colin Fowler
2008-01-15 17:01     ` Colin Fowler
2008-01-15 22:06       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-15 23:05         ` Colin Fowler
2008-01-16 15:35           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-16 16:10             ` Colin Fowler [this message]
2008-01-16 16:19               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-16 16:38                 ` Colin Fowler
2008-01-16 17:34         ` Colin Fowler
2008-01-18 10:55           ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cf3edd8d0801160810w4302afa5vd731cc6852c778ba@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=elethiomel@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®