From: Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Abhishek Bapat <abhishekbapat@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] alloc_tag: Add trace events for tracing allocations
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 10:11:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf6ff2bf-1b3c-4575-b981-fc3c65625d5d@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuCfpGZf+HDj8B2vV2WB68P2JMyqctF5CPvV0R6x=WU7+nwvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Suren
On 2026/9/25 14:14, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 12:21 AM Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Abhishek
>>
>> Sorry, I merged and tested your patches today and found a few details,
>> so I've started a separate mail thread for this review.
>>
>> On 2026/9/22 05:26, Abhishek Bapat wrote:
>>> The memory allocation profiling framework intercepts allocations across
>>> the core subsystems, but currently lacks runtime tracing hooks for
>>> standard observability tools to dynamically track the context (stack
>>> traces and lifecycles of the individual memory chunks) of the
>>> allocations made.
>>>
>>> Introduce three standard trace events to allow this tracking:
>>>
>>> 1. `alloc_tag_hit`: Fired at the exact call site. This allows userspace
>>> tools to trigger and capture a call stack.
>>> 2. `alloc_tag_mem_alloced`: Fired in alloc_tag_add upon successful
>>> allocation. It records the allocated size, the tag, and the uniquely
>>> generated codetag_ref metadata pointer.
>>> 3. `alloc_tag_mem_freed`: Fired in alloc_tag_sub right before memory is
>>> freed, yielding the same codetag_ref to allow tracing tools to find
>>> the corresponding allocation.
>>>
>>> Because the introduced trace events occur at different stages in the
>>> call stack, userspace tracing tools must stitch them together to form a
>>> complete picture of a buffer's lifetime. Here's an example of how
>>> userspace correlates these three events:
>>>
>>> 1. On `alloc_tag_hit`: The tool captures the stack trace and caches it,
>>> keyed by the combination of the current thread's PID and the `tag`.
>>> 2. On `alloc_tag_mem_alloced`: The tool extracts the PID and `tag` from
>>> the event and looks up the stack trace cached in step 1. It creates a
>>> new active allocation record, mapping the new provided `codetag_ref`
>>> to this cached stack trace and the newly returned allocation size.
>>> 3. On `alloc_tag_mem_freed`: When the memory is freed, the event yields
>>> the same `codetag_ref`. The tool uses this reference to look up the
>>> original allocation record, correlates the free, and safely retires
>>> the tracking entry.
>>>
>>> Also, introduce `alloc_tag_trace_key` static key to minimize the
>>> overhead when no tags are being traced (the usual case). Once tracing
>>> for any tag is requested, the key is set, opening the path to check
>>> whether tracing is enabled for the current tag.
>>> Nore that the mechanism to enabl tag tracing is implemented in the next
>>> patch, therefore for now, `alloc_tag_trace_key` stays always unset.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Bapat <abhishekbapat@google.com>
>>> ---
>>> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>>> include/linux/alloc_tag.h | 57 ++++++++++++---
>>> include/trace/events/alloc_tag.h | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> mm/alloc_tag.c | 28 +++++++
>>> 4 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 include/trace/events/alloc_tag.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>>> index 24420a8c06d0..29e1f7915cb9 100644
>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>> @@ -17096,6 +17096,7 @@ S: Maintained
>>> F: Documentation/mm/allocation-profiling.rst
>>> F: include/linux/alloc_tag.h
>>> F: include/linux/pgalloc_tag.h
>>> +F: include/trace/events/alloc_tag.h
>>> F: include/uapi/linux/alloc_tag.h
>>> F: mm/alloc_tag.c
>>> F: tools/testing/selftests/alloc_tag/
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/alloc_tag.h b/include/linux/alloc_tag.h
>>> index 7f2d80a59792..2994934cf44a 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/alloc_tag.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/alloc_tag.h
>>> @@ -128,12 +128,33 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct alloc_tag_counters, _shared_alloc_tag);
>>> DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_MAYBE(CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT,
>>> mem_alloc_profiling_key);
>>>
>>> +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(alloc_tag_trace_key);
>>> +
>>> static inline bool mem_alloc_profiling_enabled(void)
>>> {
>>> return static_branch_maybe(CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT,
>>> &mem_alloc_profiling_key);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static inline bool alloc_tag_trace_enabled(const struct alloc_tag *tag)
>>> +{
>>> + return static_branch_unlikely(&alloc_tag_trace_key);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void alloc_tag_trace_mem_alloc(union codetag_ref *ref, struct alloc_tag *tag,
>>> + size_t bytes);
>>> +
>>> +void alloc_tag_trace_mem_free(union codetag_ref *ref, struct alloc_tag *tag,
>>> + size_t bytes);
>>> +
>>> +void __alloc_tag_trace_hit(struct alloc_tag *tag);
>>> +
>>> +static inline void alloc_tag_trace_hit(struct alloc_tag *tag)
>>> +{
>>> + if (alloc_tag_trace_enabled(tag))
>>> + __alloc_tag_trace_hit(tag);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> bool mem_alloc_profiling_permanently_disabled(void);
>>>
>>> static inline struct alloc_tag_counters alloc_tag_read(struct alloc_tag *tag)
>>> @@ -200,8 +221,13 @@ static inline bool alloc_tag_ref_set(union codetag_ref *ref, struct alloc_tag *t
>>>
>>> static inline void alloc_tag_add(union codetag_ref *ref, struct alloc_tag *tag, size_t bytes)
>>> {
>>> - if (likely(alloc_tag_ref_set(ref, tag)))
>>> + if (likely(alloc_tag_ref_set(ref, tag))) {
>>> this_cpu_add(tag->counters->bytes, bytes);
>>> +
>>> + if (alloc_tag_trace_enabled(tag))
>>> + /* Trace successful allocs with their unique ref */
>>> + alloc_tag_trace_mem_alloc(ref, tag, bytes);
>>> + }
>>> }
>>>
>>> static inline void alloc_tag_sub(union codetag_ref *ref, size_t bytes)
>>> @@ -222,6 +248,10 @@ static inline void alloc_tag_sub(union codetag_ref *ref, size_t bytes)
>>> this_cpu_sub(tag->counters->bytes, bytes);
>>> this_cpu_dec(tag->counters->calls);
>>>
>>> + if (alloc_tag_trace_enabled(tag))
>>> + /* Trace frees with their unique ref */
>>> + alloc_tag_trace_mem_free(ref, tag, bytes);
>>> +
>>> ref->ct = NULL;
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -247,21 +277,24 @@ static inline void alloc_tag_add(union codetag_ref *ref, struct alloc_tag *tag,
>>> static inline void alloc_tag_sub(union codetag_ref *ref, size_t bytes) {}
>>> static inline void alloc_tag_set_inaccurate(struct alloc_tag *tag) {}
>>> static inline bool alloc_tag_is_inaccurate(struct alloc_tag *tag) { return false; }
>>> +#define alloc_tag_trace_hit(_tag) /* NOOP */
>>
>> I'd prefer we use `do {} while (0)` here, following the same pattern
>> as alloc_tag_record.
>>
>>> #define alloc_tag_record(p) do {} while (0)
>>>
>>> #endif /* CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING */
>>>
>>> -#define alloc_hooks_tag(_tag, _do_alloc) \
>>> -({ \
>>> - typeof(_do_alloc) _res; \
>>> - if (mem_alloc_profiling_enabled()) { \
>>> - struct alloc_tag * __maybe_unused _old; \
>>> - _old = alloc_tag_save(_tag); \
>>> - _res = _do_alloc; \
>>> - alloc_tag_restore(_tag, _old); \
>>> - } else \
>>> - _res = _do_alloc; \
>>> - _res; \
>>> +#define alloc_hooks_tag(_tag, _do_alloc) \
>>> +({ \
>>> + typeof(_do_alloc) _res; \
>>> + if (mem_alloc_profiling_enabled()) { \
>>> + struct alloc_tag * __maybe_unused _old; \
>>> + /* Fired here to cleanly capture the caller's stack trace */ \
>>> + alloc_tag_trace_hit(_tag); \
>>> + _old = alloc_tag_save(_tag); \
>>> + _res = _do_alloc; \
>>> + alloc_tag_restore(_tag, _old); \
>>> + } else \
>>> + _res = _do_alloc; \
>>> + _res; \
>>> })
>>>
>>> #define alloc_hooks(_do_alloc) \
>>> diff --git a/include/trace/events/alloc_tag.h b/include/trace/events/alloc_tag.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..af2182501864
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/include/trace/events/alloc_tag.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>>> +#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
>>> +#define TRACE_SYSTEM alloc_tag
>>> +
>>> +#if !defined(_TRACE_ALLOC_TAG_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
>>> +#define _TRACE_ALLOC_TAG_H
>>> +
>>> +#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * alloc_tag_hit is generated at the exact allocation call site and can be
>>> + * used to capture a clean stack trace.
>>> + *
>>> + * To link this stack trace to the actual allocated memory chunk, tools must
>>> + * correlate this event with the resulting alloc_tag_mem_alloced event. Since
>>> + * multiple threads can hit the same tag simultaneously, tools must match BOTH
>>> + * the `tag` field and the implicitly recorded PID provided by the core
>>> + * tracing subsystem.
>>> + */
>>> +TRACE_EVENT(alloc_tag_hit,
>>> +
>>> + TP_PROTO(struct alloc_tag *tag),
>>> +
>>> + TP_ARGS(tag),
>>> +
>>> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
>>> + __field(struct alloc_tag *, tag)
>>> + __string(modname, tag->ct.modname ? tag->ct.modname : "NONE")
>>> + __string(filename, tag->ct.filename)
>>> + __string(function, tag->ct.function)
>>> + __field(unsigned int, lineno)
>>> + ),
>>> +
>>> + TP_fast_assign(
>>> + __entry->tag = tag;
>>> + __assign_str(modname);
>>> + __assign_str(filename);
>>> + __assign_str(function);
>>> + __entry->lineno = tag->ct.lineno;
>>> + ),
>>> +
>>> + TP_printk("tag %p, module: %s, filename: %s, function %s, lineno %u",
>>> + __entry->tag,
>>> + __get_str(modname),
>>> + __get_str(filename),
>>> + __get_str(function),
>>> + __entry->lineno
>>> + )
>>> +);
>>>
>>
>> When I trace an interface provided by a kernel build-in such as shmem,
>> this is what I see in the trace:
>>
>> trig-6838 [004] ..... 1309.321906: alloc_tag_hit: tag 000000007874a2c9, module: NONE, filename: mm/shmem.c, function shmem_alloc_folio, lineno 2138
>>
>> The module field shows NONE, which looks a bit odd.
>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * alloc_tag_mem_alloced is generated after memory is successfully allocated.
>>> + * It captures the exact byte size.
>>> + *
>>> + * The `ref` pointer identifies the memory chunk for tracking its lifecycle
>>> + * (e.g., matching it with alloc_tag_mem_freed).
>>> + *
>>> + * Because the kernel isolates active allocations within the task struct
>>> + * (current->alloc_tag), this even will always share the same implicit PID as
>>> + * its corresponding alloc_tag_hit event. Tools should use the combination
>>> + * PID + `tag` to correlate them.
>>> + */
>>> +TRACE_EVENT(alloc_tag_mem_alloced,
>>> +
>>> + TP_PROTO(union codetag_ref *ref, struct alloc_tag *tag, size_t bytes),
>>> +
>>> + TP_ARGS(ref, tag, bytes),
>>> +
>>> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
>>> + __field(union codetag_ref *, ref)
>>> + __field(struct alloc_tag *, tag)
>>> + __field(size_t, bytes)
>>> + ),
>>> +
>>> + TP_fast_assign(
>>> + __entry->ref = ref;
>>> + __entry->tag = tag;
>>> + __entry->bytes = bytes;
>>> + ),
>>> +
>>> + TP_printk("reference %p, tag %p, bytes %zu",
>>> + __entry->ref,
>>> + __entry->tag,
>>> + __entry->bytes
>>> + )
>>> +);
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * alloc_tag_mem_freed event is generated immediately before memory is
>>> + * freed. The `ref` pointer matches the one emitted during allocation,
>>> + * allowing tools to match it to it's corresponding allocation and
>>> + * call stack.
>>> + */
>>
>> But the thread for allocation and free may not be the same.
>> For example, memory allocated in thread A could be freed by kswapd.
>> In this case, would the ref fail to match and falsely report a memory leak?
>
> No, ref is unique within the system, so even if alloc and free happen
> in different threads it still can be used to match them. The
> thread+tag is used only when matching alloc_tag_hit with
> alloc_tag_mem_alloced because at the time of alloc_tag_hit we don't
> yet have the ref.
>
"The ref is unique within the system" is true of the obj_ext/page_ext slot,
but for page allocations the event does not carry the slot's address,
it carries the address of a stack temporary.
/* Should be called only if mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() */
static noinline
void __pgalloc_tag_add(struct page *page, struct task_struct *task,
unsigned int nr, unsigned int alloc_flags)
{
union pgtag_ref_handle handle;
union codetag_ref ref; <- stack temporary
if (likely(get_page_tag_ref(page, &ref, &handle))) {
alloc_tag_add(&ref, task->alloc_tag, PAGE_SIZE * nr);
update_page_tag_ref(handle, &ref);
put_page_tag_ref(handle);
} else {
......
}
}
/* Should be called only if mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() */
static noinline
void __pgalloc_tag_sub(struct page *page, unsigned int nr)
{
union pgtag_ref_handle handle;
union codetag_ref ref; <- stack temporary
if (get_page_tag_ref(page, &ref, &handle)) {
alloc_tag_sub(&ref, PAGE_SIZE * nr);
update_page_tag_ref(handle, &ref);
put_page_tag_ref(handle);
}
}
Or am I missing / confusing something here?
Thanks
Best Regards
Hao
>>
>> Thanks
>> Best Regards
>> Hao
>>
>>> +TRACE_EVENT(alloc_tag_mem_freed,
>>> +
>>> + TP_PROTO(union codetag_ref *ref, struct alloc_tag *tag, size_t bytes),
>>> +
>>> + TP_ARGS(ref, tag, bytes),
>>> +
>>> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
>>> + __field(union codetag_ref *, ref)
>>> + __field(struct alloc_tag *, tag)
>>> + __field(size_t, bytes)
>>> + ),
>>> +
>>> + TP_fast_assign(
>>> + __entry->ref = ref;
>>> + __entry->tag = tag;
>>> + __entry->bytes = bytes;
>>> + ),
>>> +
>>> + TP_printk("reference %p, tag %p, bytes %zu",
>>> + __entry->ref,
>>> + __entry->tag,
>>> + __entry->bytes
>>> + )
>>> +);
>>> +
>>> +#endif /* _TRACE_ALLOC_TAG_H */
>>> +
>>> +/* This part must be outside protection */
>>> +#include <trace/define_trace.h>
>>> diff --git a/mm/alloc_tag.c b/mm/alloc_tag.c
>>> index f30ef8dd24c7..a5339767efd5 100644
>>> --- a/mm/alloc_tag.c
>>> +++ b/mm/alloc_tag.c
>>> @@ -19,6 +19,9 @@
>>> #include <linux/kmemleak.h>
>>> #include <uapi/linux/alloc_tag.h>
>>>
>>> +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>>> +#include <trace/events/alloc_tag.h>
>>> +
>>> #include "internal.h"
>>> #include "page_alloc.h"
>>>
>>> @@ -55,6 +58,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mem_alloc_profiling_key);
>>>
>>> DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(mem_profiling_compressed);
>>>
>>> +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(alloc_tag_trace_key);
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_tag_trace_key);
>>> +
>>> struct alloc_tag_kernel_section kernel_tags = { NULL, 0 };
>>> unsigned long alloc_tag_ref_mask;
>>> int alloc_tag_ref_offs;
>>> @@ -485,6 +491,28 @@ static const struct proc_ops allocinfo_proc_ops = {
>>> #endif
>>> };
>>>
>>> +void __alloc_tag_trace_hit(struct alloc_tag *tag)
>>> +{
>>> + if (unlikely(!tag))
>>> + return;
>>> + trace_alloc_tag_hit(tag);
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__alloc_tag_trace_hit);
>>> +
>>> +void alloc_tag_trace_mem_alloc(union codetag_ref *ref, struct alloc_tag *tag,
>>> + size_t bytes)
>>> +{
>>> + trace_alloc_tag_mem_alloced(ref, tag, bytes);
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_tag_trace_mem_alloc);
>>> +
>>> +void alloc_tag_trace_mem_free(union codetag_ref *ref, struct alloc_tag *tag,
>>> + size_t bytes)
>>> +{
>>> + trace_alloc_tag_mem_freed(ref, tag, bytes);
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_tag_trace_mem_free);
>>> +
>>> size_t alloc_tag_top_users(struct codetag_bytes *tags, size_t count, bool can_sleep)
>>> {
>>> struct codetag_iterator iter;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 2:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 21:26 [PATCH 0/4] alloc_tag: Introduce selective tracing for MAP Abhishek Bapat
2026-09-21 21:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] alloc_tag: Add trace events for tracing allocations Abhishek Bapat
2026-09-23 9:56 ` Hao Ge
2026-09-23 20:12 ` Abhishek Bapat
2026-09-24 1:22 ` Hao Ge
2026-09-24 7:22 ` Hao Ge
2026-09-25 6:14 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-09-28 2:11 ` Hao Ge [this message]
2026-09-21 21:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] alloc_tag: Introduce IOCTLs to toggle allocation tracepoints Abhishek Bapat
2026-09-24 8:17 ` Hao Ge
2026-09-25 6:18 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-09-25 21:25 ` Abhishek Bapat
2026-09-25 21:28 ` Abhishek Bapat
2026-09-21 21:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] alloc_tag: extend allocinfo_filter to support tracing queries Abhishek Bapat
2026-09-21 21:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] alloc_tag: add a test for trace state toggle and filtering Abhishek Bapat
2026-09-27 16:01 ` kernel test robot
2026-09-24 9:53 ` [PATCH 0/4] alloc_tag: Introduce selective tracing for MAP Hao Ge
2026-09-25 6:04 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cf6ff2bf-1b3c-4575-b981-fc3c65625d5d@linux.dev \
--to=hao.ge@linux.dev \
--cc=abhishekbapat@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®