From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from madrid.collaboradmins.com (madrid.collaboradmins.com [46.235.227.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15061224D7; Mon, 20 May 2024 10:12:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.227.194 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716199932; cv=none; b=ifmvggwdRpFfW8TSi3I0UezfU20DuwpQ7KrwuvprVt1A1q6HZd05SPfFR46V44Ri8LxOG5y6TlBFcwRiAL0wi/ntTnx19XHW/szl48GixoRBxxd1zGsfJ/yyJkcyn/xuBvB2ZpwvKaWNXHJ7jekfC7nArURrQCT0p6q1lsThICY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716199932; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6NDH0z522me5vrgmflzfx3WQmnMcDdrAZ53MUWxQv/4=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=g19ZYwiAKNwQcocUsUqqusmbvvBGGUZMTlPxQ9lP6OUvvusEP0h/168aKMhcvpSyuCi+LNIOIU2HMeNAF4n9SZKKVodMipBQBf4bAOT5UbZwhqag0xMZs7Kg+NYDXfw8akkmy+bbs8htezLh2ysWVBecdJayuGqoNV6vAsu/0U4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=3RKlVEnw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.227.194 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="3RKlVEnw" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1716199929; bh=6NDH0z522me5vrgmflzfx3WQmnMcDdrAZ53MUWxQv/4=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=3RKlVEnwwt+L5N6iv4pr5sMiBA1t3K7kWgvqTEz2d1rPQs0u9QxBIfxWjsU5Ch537 MwoEupaZcfEH4C6n5h8R0IDoqxWmROmYlaHoRlRJ7wjPrBZ/Q2kUZEOg5xMLmKHsni LVSNEE08mvwsn0Jen6ElZtG6U57kCmUC11S4ghbAqW0cEyQAuYpJesHhj8ADRfXdR4 5qHAg0a9Wh0ytta1OEjeFBngPVBUthhT1DGluv2H5NzRfI/2ci45MZdCBWuUId4/nQ TlCXVJzXpd2Jo6UUexOJwg2S72A7G0xA08/Z8OG9HNea6u1utU6oHEu+C8h44MZUUM Ah+2Y+6LS3jtA== Received: from [100.113.186.2] (cola.collaboradmins.com [195.201.22.229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by madrid.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B0B037809D1; Mon, 20 May 2024 10:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 12:12:08 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8365: use a specific SCPSYS compatible To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Lee Jones , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Matthias Brugger , MandyJH Liu , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Alexandre Mergnat References: <20240518211159.142920-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <20240518211159.142920-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <2cc638ca-0add-4c8c-b844-606e22dbd253@linaro.org> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <2cc638ca-0add-4c8c-b844-606e22dbd253@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Il 20/05/24 12:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto: > On 20/05/2024 11:55, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >> Il 18/05/24 23:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto: >>> SoCs should use dedicated compatibles for each of their syscon nodes to >>> precisely describe the block. Using an incorrect compatible does not >>> allow to properly match/validate children of the syscon device. Replace >>> SYSCFG compatible, which does not have children, with a new dedicated >>> one for SCPSYS block. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >> >> Technically, that's not a SCPSYS block, but called SYSCFG in MT8365, but the >> meaning and the functioning is the same, so it's fine for me. > > So there are two syscfg blocks? With exactly the same set of registers > or different? > I'm not sure about that, I don't have the MT8365 datasheet... Adding Alexandre to the loop - I think he can clarify as he should have the required documentation. Cheers