mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@nxp.com>,
	Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>,
	Beeman Strong <beeman@rivosinc.com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>,
	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/27] Legacy hardware/cache events as json
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 17:10:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf9aa030-1ac0-4b40-a613-d50a6feb138a@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b1a461b4-4358-4556-80ef-e7abd686f2e5@linaro.org>



On 16/10/2025 11:29 am, James Clark wrote:
> 
> 
> On 15/10/2025 10:24 pm, Ian Rogers wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 10:39 AM James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org> 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 15/10/2025 4:53 pm, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 05 Oct 2025 11:24:03 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Mirroring similar work for software events in commit 6e9fa4131abb
>>>>> ("perf parse-events: Remove non-json software events"). These changes
>>>>> migrate the legacy hardware and cache events to json.  With no hard
>>>>> coded legacy hardware or cache events the wild card, case
>>>>> insensitivity, etc. is consistent for events. This does, however, mean
>>>>> events like cycles will wild card against all PMUs. A change doing the
>>>>> same was originally posted and merged from:
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240416061533.921723-10-irogers@google.com
>>>>> and reverted by Linus in commit 4f1b067359ac ("Revert "perf
>>>>> parse-events: Prefer sysfs/JSON hardware events over legacy"") due to
>>>>> his dislike for the cycles behavior on ARM with perf record. Earlier
>>>>> patches in this series make perf record event opening failures
>>>>> non-fatal and hide the cycles event's failure to open on ARM in perf
>>>>> record, so it is expected the behavior will now be transparent in perf
>>>>> record on ARM. perf stat with a cycles event will wildcard open the
>>>>> event on all PMUs, however, with default events the cycles event will
>>>>> only be opened on core PMUs.
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Namhyung
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Namhyung,
>>>
>>> I'm still getting the build failure that I mentioned on patch 5. This
>>> only seems to happen with out of source builds:
>>>
>>>     $ make -C tools/perf O=../build/local/ V=1
>>>
>>>
>>>     static const struct pmu_sys_events pmu_sys_event_tables[] = {
>>>           {
>>> -               .event_table = {
>>> -                       .pmus = pmu_events__test_soc_sys,
>>> -                       .num_pmus = ARRAY_SIZE(pmu_events__test_soc_sys)
>>> -               },
>>> -               .name = "pmu_events__test_soc_sys",
>>> -       },
>>> -       {
>>>                   .event_table = { 0, 0 },
>>>                   .metric_table = { 0, 0 },
>>>           },
>>> make[3]: *** [pmu-events/Build:54:
>>> /home/james/workspace/linux/build/local/pmu-events/empty-pmu-events.log]
>>> Error 1
>>
>> Sorry for the issue. Is this happening when you don't do a clean
>> first? I tried recreating your output path, but I can't reproduce the
>> issue on a clean build. The diff above indicates some issue with the
> 
> The clean issue was separate to the build failure. I meant that the 
> build failure was sticky when I was bisecting. So after commit 5 the 
> build breaks on a clean build but then it stayed broken even on builds 
> before commit 5 unless I cleaned. I think we can ignore this for now.
> 
>> Makefile processing tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/test/test_soc/. This
>> directory should be copied to
>> ../build/local/pmu-events/arch/test/test_soc/ and so I wonder if the
>> copy failed for some reason.
>>
>> The copy rule is:
>> https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools- 
>> next.git/tree/tools/perf/pmu-events/Build?h=perf-tools-next#n33
>> ```
>> # Copy checked-in json for generation.
>> $(OUTPUT)pmu-events/arch/%: pmu-events/arch/%
>> $(call rule_mkdir)
>> $(Q)$(call echo-cmd,gen)cp $< $@
>> ```
>>
>> The mapping of file names happens in the patsubst in:
>> https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools- 
>> next.git/tree/tools/perf/pmu-events/Build?h=perf-tools-next#n42
>> ```
>> GEN_JSON = $(patsubst %,$(OUTPUT)%,$(JSON)) $(LEGACY_CACHE_JSON)
>> ```
>>
>> Those files are dependencies for the empty-pmu-events.c test so I'm
>> not sure how this can be failing for you.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ian
> 
> If I apply this patchset to commit 2a67955de136 ("perf bpf_counter: Fix 
> opening of "any"(-1) CPU events"), then:
> 
>    $ rm -r ../build/local ; mkdir ../build/local
>    $ git clean -xfd
>    $ make -C tools/perf O=../build/local/ -j1 V=1
> 
> I get no copy of the test jsons:
> 
>    $ ls ../build/local/pmu-events/arch/test/test_soc/
> 
>    ls: cannot access '../build/local/pmu-events/arch/test/test_soc/': No
>    such file or directory
> 
> Looking at the dependencies of the rule for $(PMU_EVENTS_C), it's 
> $(JSON_TEST), but JSON_TEST is the in-source version without the 
> $(OUTPUT) prefix. That's already satisfied so it skips the copy.
> 
> If I modify the generator for JSON_TEST to include the OUTPUT prefix:
> 
> JSON_TEST    =  $(shell [ -d $(JDIR_TEST) ] &   \
>      find $(JDIR_TEST) -name '*.json' | sed -e 's|^|$(OUTPUT)|g')
> 
> Now I get the copy:
> 
>    $ ls ../build/local/pmu-events/arch/test/test_soc/
> 
>    total 0
>    drwxrwxr-x 1 james  56 Oct 16 11:13 ..
>    drwxrwxr-x 1 james 108 Oct 16 11:13 cpu
>    drwxrwxr-x 1 james  12 Oct 16 11:13 .
>    drwxrwxr-x 1 james  22 Oct 16 11:13 sys
> 
> Now the diff check is slightly different/better, but the build still 
> fails. Weirdly I don't see this failure on my Arm machine which is where 
> I tested the whole set, I only see this failure on x86. Maybe some 
> difference in the version of make?
> 

Turned out to be an extra json file I had in the Perf tree for my 
compilation database, so that explains why I was the only person seeing 
it. Sent a fix.



      reply	other threads:[~2025-10-20 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-05 18:24 Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 01/27] perf parse-events: Fix legacy cache events if event is duplicated in a PMU Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 02/27] perf perf_api_probe: Avoid scanning all PMUs, try software PMU first Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 03/27] perf stat: Avoid wildcarding PMUs for default events Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 04/27] perf record: Skip don't fail for events that don't open Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 05/27] perf jevents: Support copying the source json files to OUTPUT Ian Rogers
2025-10-08 11:10   ` James Clark
2025-10-08 14:58     ` Ian Rogers
2025-10-08 15:14       ` James Clark
2025-10-08 21:43         ` Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 06/27] perf pmu: Don't eagerly parse event terms Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 07/27] perf parse-events: Remove unused FILE input argument to scanner Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 08/27] perf pmu: Use fd rather than FILE from new_alias Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 09/27] perf pmu: Factor term parsing into a perf_event_attr into a helper Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 10/27] perf parse-events: Add terms for legacy hardware and cache config values Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 11/27] perf jevents: Add legacy json terms and default_core event table helper Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 12/27] perf pmu: Add and use legacy_terms in alias information Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 13/27] perf jevents: Add legacy-hardware and legacy-cache json Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 14/27] perf print-events: Remove print_hwcache_events Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 15/27] perf print-events: Remove print_symbol_events Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 16/27] perf parse-events: Remove hard coded legacy hardware and cache parsing Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 17/27] perf record: Use evlist__new_default when no events specified Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 18/27] perf top: " Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 19/27] perf evlist: Avoid scanning all PMUs for evlist__new_default Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 20/27] perf evsel: Improvements to __evsel__match Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 21/27] perf test parse-events: Use evsel__match for legacy events Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 22/27] perf test parse-events: Without a PMU use cpu-cycles rather than cycles Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 23/27] perf test parse-events: Remove cpu PMU requirement Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 24/27] perf test: Switch cycles event to cpu-cycles Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 25/27] perf test: Clean up test_..config helpers Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 26/27] perf test parse-events: Add evlist test helper Ian Rogers
2025-10-05 18:24 ` [PATCH v7 27/27] perf test parse-events: Add evsel " Ian Rogers
2025-10-08 11:06 ` [PATCH v7 00/27] Legacy hardware/cache events as json James Clark
2025-10-08 14:53   ` Ian Rogers
2025-10-15 15:53 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-10-15 17:39   ` James Clark
2025-10-15 21:24     ` Ian Rogers
2025-10-16 10:29       ` James Clark
2025-10-20 16:10         ` James Clark [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cf9aa030-1ac0-4b40-a613-d50a6feb138a@linaro.org \
    --to=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=beeman@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
    --cc=xu.yang_2@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®