From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3153FC433DF for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:00:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0682B2073E for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:00:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="elmIn/w9" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733061AbgFWQAi (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 12:00:38 -0400 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]:40806 "EHLO lelv0143.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1733012AbgFWQAi (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 12:00:38 -0400 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05NFxoNB045823; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:59:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1592927990; bh=olC4l/jXzIroYJbEpRReyOUqgRg7I8gSJNp27yn9+/g=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=elmIn/w9jpsWEuzqTTEYJMbNKlN3CikTLSag64yS0+7RWQhvsgkwgPuhSnidqaH3Y zLFp4scutmYLF7bf1PmT96FcQcJmQahn/lROVxVGJdOZOUR3UP4ucXrxsnrV9CA7tE hB02ImQxeZkTKLUtZglqNab7Oy6xEg00+9XjJCQE= Received: from DFLE108.ent.ti.com (dfle108.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.29]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05NFxotF083470 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:59:50 -0500 Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) by DFLE108.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:59:50 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:59:50 -0500 Received: from [10.250.52.63] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05NFxnjP128978; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:59:50 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ASoC: tas2562: Update shutdown GPIO property To: , , , , CC: , , References: <20200612171412.25423-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <20200612171412.25423-2-dmurphy@ti.com> From: Dan Murphy Message-ID: Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:59:49 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200612171412.25423-2-dmurphy@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello On 6/12/20 12:14 PM, Dan Murphy wrote: > Update the shutdown GPIO property to be shutdown from shut-down. I have some other patches that go on top of this patchset I am wondering if I should re-submit with those patches on top or indicate in a cover letter the dependency Dan