From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753505AbYEaF3L (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 May 2008 01:29:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750962AbYEaF24 (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 May 2008 01:28:56 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.238]:9307 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750955AbYEaF2z (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 May 2008 01:28:55 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=O+RXhEsx3IWNSSdMbkfe/iKZzLhbAzSSO/EeJXmtIa4BwKv4tZgOPHj8/wN6AJOBHN4JZw8u6vRdHeeWW8A8p8kfk+VAcRIOCzPa5zlinx048IWiTeGI+blZyf+cdzDDPhH1Gh8TQUiho5KE+9vR5FMrfk1BoBfuoppcGbQjZwQ= Message-ID: Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 07:28:54 +0200 From: "Michael Kerrisk" To: "Miklos Szeredi" Subject: Re: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v3] Cc: drepper@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-man@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <482D4665.4050401@gmail.com> <48401E7E.9090304@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > Michael, > >> You omitted to answer my question, the last sentence below: > > Oh, come on. Where in my last mail did I say that these fixes > shouldn't be applied? I didn't say you did. However, while saying "I understand your frustration", you simply ignored this question, which I would say was fairly important in the context, and asked me to write another version of the patch against your tree. My takeaway from this is that you attach a higher priority to seeing that your tree isn't broken, than to seeing that these bugs get fixed. Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html