From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56206C4320A for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 12:44:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33AC76113C for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 12:44:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241458AbhHEMog (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 08:44:36 -0400 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:44856 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240237AbhHEMof (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 08:44:35 -0400 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 175CiB74098873; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 07:44:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1628167451; bh=7pjBF/UArmuCRMUwAIcRjaLxP+RgNbRDP9R6RHrwlyQ=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=zQ6RBpyWvg9wdh690ULdv+F5GXCrDLt0ph7lklqCwRssh9EPG+pBMaqtP8lvF7zwt z1WYUfk7TjKPzxRAl2EgV+5/H3fX9jMRA/i8D1+rm8IyNZfL6j8O4XYP6pc5GADcwH NTvSPXu6rcwqaO8EIAm3TT+6JBN83MjEqBXNR3rM= Received: from DLEE112.ent.ti.com (dlee112.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.23]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 175CiB8U045683 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 07:44:11 -0500 Received: from DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) by DLEE112.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 07:44:11 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 07:44:11 -0500 Received: from [10.250.232.51] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 175Ci7Rc026017; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 07:44:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] CAN: Add support for CAN in AM65,J721e and AM64 To: Jan Kiszka , Nishanth Menon CC: , , , Tero Kristo , Rob Herring , Marc Kleine-Budde , Lokesh Vutla , Faiz Abbas References: <20210726101012.26983-1-a-govindraju@ti.com> <20210802124509.z23lfg7xxkqaakbo@truce> <36011cee-f617-02ed-7446-c297ba65e6bf@ti.com> <35b0e2dc-0591-0a2f-8e3d-4177792a13fa@siemens.com> From: Aswath Govindraju Message-ID: Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 18:14:07 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <35b0e2dc-0591-0a2f-8e3d-4177792a13fa@siemens.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jan, On 05/08/21 6:10 pm, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 05.08.21 14:32, Aswath Govindraju wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 02/08/21 6:15 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>> On 15:40-20210726, Aswath Govindraju wrote: >>>> The following series of patches add support for CAN in SoC's AM65, J721e >>>> and AM64. >>>> >>>> This patch series is dependent on [1] and [2] and I have requested for an >>>> immutable tag from the Marc Kleine-Budde(maintainer of net tree). >>>> >>>> [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1423048/ >>>> [2] - https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-can/msg08108.html >>>> >>>> changes since v1 - >>>> - changed the message ram configuration to use the maximum value >>>> in each field, for better performance. >>>> >>>> Aswath Govindraju (3): >>>> arm64: dts: ti: am654-base-board: Disable mcan nodes >>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64-main: Add support for MCAN >>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-evm/sk: Add support for main domain mcan >>>> nodes in EVM and disable them on SK >>>> >>>> Faiz Abbas (3): >>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65-mcu: Add Support for MCAN >>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e: Add support for MCAN nodes >>>> arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-common-proc-board: Add support for mcu_mcan >>>> nodes >>> >>> I noticed in my checkup: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/zSk39M943N/ >>> warnings with dtbs_check, I think the bindings need a little more help >>> here (please also notice the iot platform warnings getting introduced). >>> >> >> Jan, >> >> Can you please point me to the schematics for iot platform? Also, is CAN >> subsystem brought out on the iot platform boards? > > Schematics aren't publicly available. If you have specific questions, I > may help, though. > > CAN is not in use yet (not connected AFAIK). > Thank you for clarifying this. I will disable the CAN DT nodes in k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi in my respin. Thanks, Aswath > Jan > >> >>> Since we are still working on the bindings[1], lets clean that up >>> before we consider the dts addition. I suspect we need to cook this >>> more towards the next cycle. >>> >>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1470806/ >>> >> >> Nishanth, >> >> Sorry for not taking of this earlier. I'll try to get everything ready >> for next release. >> >> Thanks, >> Aswath >> >