From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263806AbUFKKxY (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2004 06:53:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263810AbUFKKxY (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2004 06:53:24 -0400 Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:8892 "EHLO mail.cs.helsinki.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263806AbUFKKxX (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2004 06:53:23 -0400 References: <200406082124.i58LOuOL016163@melkki.cs.helsinki.fi> <20040609113455.U22989@build.pdx.osdl.net> <1086812001.13026.63.camel@cherry> <1086812486.2810.21.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> <1086814663.13026.70.camel@cherry> <20040609205944.GA21150@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <1086815269.13026.76.camel@cherry> From: "Pekka J Enberg" To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Chris Wright , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ALSA: Remove subsystem-specific malloc (1/8) Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 13:53:22 +0300 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pekka J Enberg writes: > Agreed. I'm wondering if the overflow case should set size to zero and > call kmalloc() as well. Ehh... obviously not. The overflow case should _always_ fail whereas zero-order allocation can do whatever it wants. Sorry for the noise. Pekka