From: Yiyang Chen <chenyy23@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Cc: Yiyang Chen <chenyy23@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>,
Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>,
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/2] bpf: Reject offset refcount acquire arguments
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 06:11:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1782192383.git.chenyy23@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> (raw)
bpf_refcount_acquire() is modeled as returning a refcounted allocation
base, but it currently accepts PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC arguments whose
offset already points at an embedded graph node returned from a list or
rbtree operation.
At runtime the kfunc starts from the supplied pointer and adds the type's
refcount offset. With a graph-node pointer, that starts from base +
node_off, while the verifier treats the returned pointer as the allocation
base. Reject non-zero fixed-offset arguments to keep the runtime operation
and the verifier model aligned.
Programs that pop graph nodes can still acquire a reference after
normalizing the node pointer with container_of().
Patch 1 handles the zero fixed-offset requirement in the existing
check_func_arg_reg_off() / __check_ptr_off_reg() path without consuming a
bpf_type_flag bit.
Patch 2 adds a rejected direct list-node case.
Changes from v3:
- Add Eduard's Acked-by to patch 1.
- Drop the redundant rbtree selftest case; the list case exercises the same
refcount-acquire fixed-offset rejection path.
- Trim the selftest commit message and remove the selftest Fixes tag.
Changes from v2:
- Avoid adding a new bpf_type_flag bit.
- Carry the refcount-acquire zero fixed-offset requirement with an
internal check_func_arg_reg_off() parameter.
Changes from v1:
- Move zero fixed-offset enforcement into check_func_arg_reg_off() /
__check_ptr_off_reg(), as suggested by Eduard.
- Drop the positive container_of() selftest case.
- Remove the stale bpf_obj_drop() after bpf_list_push_front(), since the
pushed reference is consumed even when the verifier explores the error
branch.
- Rebase to bpf-next master a975094bf98c.
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/cover.1781979133.git.chenyy23@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/cover.1781963957.git.chenyy23@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/cover.1781852308.git.chenyy23@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn/
Yiyang Chen (2):
bpf: Reject offset refcount acquire arguments
selftests/bpf: Cover refcount acquire node offsets
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 32 +++++++++++------
.../bpf/progs/refcounted_kptr_fail.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
base-commit: a975094bf98ca97be9146f9d3b5681a6f9cf5ce3
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-23 6:11 Yiyang Chen [this message]
2026-06-23 6:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] " Yiyang Chen
2026-06-23 7:01 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-23 21:52 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-06-25 21:30 ` Yonghong Song
2026-06-23 6:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover refcount acquire node offsets Yiyang Chen
2026-06-23 21:50 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-06-25 21:39 ` Yonghong Song
2026-06-26 12:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/2] bpf: Reject offset refcount acquire arguments patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1782192383.git.chenyy23@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn \
--to=chenyy23@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=vmalik@redhat.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®