mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
To: seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	nikunj@amd.com,  yosry@kernel.org,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: x86: Honor EFER_LMSLE_MBZ
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:25:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1790208413.git.jmattson@google.com> (raw)

v1 was a single patch that made KVM reject EFER.LMSLE=1 when the guest's
CPUID enumerates EFER_LMSLE_MBZ, CPUID.80000008H:EBX[bit 20].  Review turned
up two more things: KVM's *own* enumeration of the defeature is wrong today,
and the new guest-CPUID check needs an escape hatch so that userspace can
still set the bit on a host where KVM doesn't advertise it.

The motivation, as discussed in the v1 thread, is to be able to defeature a
virtual Rome, i.e. to set EFER_LMSLE_MBZ even though Rome itself supports
long mode segment limits, so that the vCPU can be hosted on Milan and later.
The opposite direction isn't interesting; in general you can't host
generation N+1 on generation N.

Patch 1 fixes KVM's enumeration of the defeature.  Today KVM passes
hardware's EFER_LMSLE_MBZ through as-is, i.e. leaves the bit clear on Intel
and on AMD with kvm_amd.nested=0, which tells userspace that long mode
segment limits *are* available.  But KVM allows EFER.LMSLE if and only if
nested SVM is supported, so on exactly those hosts KVM then rejects
WRMSR(EFER) with EFER.LMSLE=1.  Set EFER_LMSLE_MBZ whenever KVM refuses
EFER.LMSLE; the bit means precisely "EFER.LMSLE must be zero".  Note, this
is guest visible for userspace that reflects KVM's supported CPUID into the
guest.

Patch 2 is v1, plus the partial-emulation hunk Sean suggested so that
userspace can set EFER_LMSLE_MBZ on a host that does support LMSLE.  It
also masks EFER_LMSLE out of the value consumed by efer_trap().  Under
SEV-ES, EFER writes are *trapped*, not intercepted.  Rejecting the write
would inject a #GP *and* leave EFER.LMSLE set, which is strictly worse than
honoring a write that hardware allowed.

Patches 3 and 4 rename svm_nested_clear_efer_svme to svm_nested_efer_test
and add coverage for the defeature.

Tested on Rome, which supports LMSLE and so actually exercises the emulated
path, and on Skylake.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260918154530.4129698-1-jmattson@google.com

Jim Mattson (4):
  KVM: x86: Advertise EFER_LMSLE_MBZ when KVM disallows EFER.LMSLE
  KVM: x86: Honor the guest's EFER_LMSLE_MBZ
  KVM: selftests: Rename svm_nested_clear_efer_svme to
    svm_nested_efer_test
  KVM: selftests: Add coverage for the EFER_LMSLE_MBZ defeature

 Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst                |  25 ++
 arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c                          |  20 ++
 arch/x86/kvm/msrs.c                           |  12 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c                        |  21 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c                        |   7 +
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                            |   9 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm      |   2 +-
 .../selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h     |   1 +
 .../kvm/x86/svm_nested_clear_efer_svme.c      |  50 ----
 .../selftests/kvm/x86/svm_nested_efer_test.c  | 273 ++++++++++++++++++
 10 files changed, 366 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/svm_nested_clear_efer_svme.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/svm_nested_efer_test.c


base-commit: f0100363d8c374bd8e9ea7c9ba02744f0b802ca4
-- 
2.56.0.rc1.315.gc6ed9934b7-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2026-09-24  0:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24  0:25 Jim Mattson [this message]
2026-09-24  0:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: x86: Advertise EFER_LMSLE_MBZ when KVM disallows EFER.LMSLE Jim Mattson
2026-09-24  0:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: x86: Honor the guest's EFER_LMSLE_MBZ Jim Mattson
2026-09-24  0:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: selftests: Rename svm_nested_clear_efer_svme to svm_nested_efer_test Jim Mattson
2026-09-24  0:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: selftests: Add coverage for the EFER_LMSLE_MBZ defeature Jim Mattson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1790208413.git.jmattson@google.com \
    --to=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikunj@amd.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=yosry@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®