From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
To: seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nikunj@amd.com, yosry@kernel.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: x86: Honor EFER_LMSLE_MBZ
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:25:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1790208413.git.jmattson@google.com> (raw)
v1 was a single patch that made KVM reject EFER.LMSLE=1 when the guest's
CPUID enumerates EFER_LMSLE_MBZ, CPUID.80000008H:EBX[bit 20]. Review turned
up two more things: KVM's *own* enumeration of the defeature is wrong today,
and the new guest-CPUID check needs an escape hatch so that userspace can
still set the bit on a host where KVM doesn't advertise it.
The motivation, as discussed in the v1 thread, is to be able to defeature a
virtual Rome, i.e. to set EFER_LMSLE_MBZ even though Rome itself supports
long mode segment limits, so that the vCPU can be hosted on Milan and later.
The opposite direction isn't interesting; in general you can't host
generation N+1 on generation N.
Patch 1 fixes KVM's enumeration of the defeature. Today KVM passes
hardware's EFER_LMSLE_MBZ through as-is, i.e. leaves the bit clear on Intel
and on AMD with kvm_amd.nested=0, which tells userspace that long mode
segment limits *are* available. But KVM allows EFER.LMSLE if and only if
nested SVM is supported, so on exactly those hosts KVM then rejects
WRMSR(EFER) with EFER.LMSLE=1. Set EFER_LMSLE_MBZ whenever KVM refuses
EFER.LMSLE; the bit means precisely "EFER.LMSLE must be zero". Note, this
is guest visible for userspace that reflects KVM's supported CPUID into the
guest.
Patch 2 is v1, plus the partial-emulation hunk Sean suggested so that
userspace can set EFER_LMSLE_MBZ on a host that does support LMSLE. It
also masks EFER_LMSLE out of the value consumed by efer_trap(). Under
SEV-ES, EFER writes are *trapped*, not intercepted. Rejecting the write
would inject a #GP *and* leave EFER.LMSLE set, which is strictly worse than
honoring a write that hardware allowed.
Patches 3 and 4 rename svm_nested_clear_efer_svme to svm_nested_efer_test
and add coverage for the defeature.
Tested on Rome, which supports LMSLE and so actually exercises the emulated
path, and on Skylake.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260918154530.4129698-1-jmattson@google.com
Jim Mattson (4):
KVM: x86: Advertise EFER_LMSLE_MBZ when KVM disallows EFER.LMSLE
KVM: x86: Honor the guest's EFER_LMSLE_MBZ
KVM: selftests: Rename svm_nested_clear_efer_svme to
svm_nested_efer_test
KVM: selftests: Add coverage for the EFER_LMSLE_MBZ defeature
Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 25 ++
arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 20 ++
arch/x86/kvm/msrs.c | 12 +-
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 21 +-
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 7 +
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 9 +-
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm | 2 +-
.../selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h | 1 +
.../kvm/x86/svm_nested_clear_efer_svme.c | 50 ----
.../selftests/kvm/x86/svm_nested_efer_test.c | 273 ++++++++++++++++++
10 files changed, 366 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/svm_nested_clear_efer_svme.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/svm_nested_efer_test.c
base-commit: f0100363d8c374bd8e9ea7c9ba02744f0b802ca4
--
2.56.0.rc1.315.gc6ed9934b7-goog
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 0:25 Jim Mattson [this message]
2026-09-24 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: x86: Advertise EFER_LMSLE_MBZ when KVM disallows EFER.LMSLE Jim Mattson
2026-09-24 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: x86: Honor the guest's EFER_LMSLE_MBZ Jim Mattson
2026-09-24 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: selftests: Rename svm_nested_clear_efer_svme to svm_nested_efer_test Jim Mattson
2026-09-24 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: selftests: Add coverage for the EFER_LMSLE_MBZ defeature Jim Mattson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1790208413.git.jmattson@google.com \
--to=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=yosry@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®