From: Yingjie Wang <x-professor@outlook.com>
To: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>,
Alexey Gladkov <legion@kernel.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "Yingjie Wang" <x-professor@outlook.com>,
"Vasily Averin" <vasily.averin@linux.dev>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Shakeel Butt" <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Alejandro Colomar" <alx@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"cgroups@vger.kernel.org" <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-api@vger.kernel.org" <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-man@vger.kernel.org" <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/3] ipc/sem: account dynamic sops arrays and validate SEMOPM
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 05:03:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1793250194.git.x-professor@outlook.com> (raw)
Shakeel, thanks for the suggestion.
Patch 1 now uses GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT for every dynamically allocated sops
array. The first 64 operations still use the existing stack buffer. The
fixed 1000-operation exemption and its conditional allocation flags have
been removed.
I compared this version with v4 in a 4-vCPU KVM guest. The benchmark process
was pinned to one vCPU. Each number is the median of 21 samples from three
fresh boots of each kernel. In a leaf memory cgroup, the changes were:
65 500 1000
successful semop() +3.2% +3.2% +2.3%
allocation-focused invalid semid +5.6% +9.1% +11.9%
The invalid-sem-id case allocates and copies the operation array before
returning EINVAL, so it emphasizes allocation overhead. The 64-operation
stack controls changed by 0.9% and 0.5%, respectively. The already-accounted
1001-operation controls changed by 1.0% and -0.2%. Successful calls in the
root cgroup changed by at most 2.3%, including the controls.
The sysctl handler parses writes into a temporary array while holding a
per-IPC-namespace mutex. The mutex covers the snapshot, validation, and
publication, so a failed write leaves the live settings unchanged and a
partial write cannot restore fields from an older snapshot. The snapshot and
publication use READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE(), and reads continue through
proc_dointvec(). The unused sem_check_semmni() helper is also removed.
The UAPI warning about physical fragmentation is obsolete now that the
operation array uses kvmalloc(). The header describes SEMOPM as the
compiled-in default and retains the uniform <= INT_MAX range comment.
Patches 2 and 3 are unchanged from v4 and retain Manfred's Reviewed-by tags.
The series is based on 7be4bc52fd9e ("Merge tag 'driver-core-7.4-rc1' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core").
Validation completed on v5:
- a W=1 full x86-64 bzImage build;
- W=1 i386 builds of ipc/sem.o and ipc/ipc_sysctl.o;
- three paired boots of v4 and v5 for the root/leaf memcg benchmark, with
seven samples for every path, cgroup, and operation count in each boot;
- initial and user-owned non-initial IPC namespaces rejected negative SEMOPM,
invalid SEMMNI, and malformed writes without changing live settings;
- zero and positive SEMOPM values remained valid, including the 1000/1001
operation boundary;
- concurrent partial, full, rejected, and successful sysctl writes completed
without stale-snapshot overwrites;
- successful, EAGAIN, EFAULT, signal-interruption, and IPC_RMID paths released
operation-array allocations;
- no BUG, WARNING, KASAN, UBSAN, or lock dependency report appeared;
- strict checkpatch with the intentional CONST_STRUCT diagnostic ignored,
and patch application checks passed.
Changes since v4:
- account every dynamically allocated sops array with GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT, as
Shakeel suggested;
- remove the separate 1000-operation accounting threshold;
- add root and leaf memory-cgroup benchmark results for 64, 65, 500, 1000,
and 1001 operations.
V4:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1793207025.git.x-professor@outlook.com
Review of v4 1/3 by Shakeel:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/565d855cbd81e0f49018da21df00ff0308f646b1.1793207025.git.x-professor@outlook.com
Yingjie Wang (3):
ipc/sem: account dynamically allocated sops arrays to memcg
ipc/sem: reject negative SEMOPM values
ipc/sem: remove obsolete SEMOPM fragmentation warning
include/linux/ipc_namespace.h | 3 +++
include/uapi/linux/sem.h | 7 +++----
ipc/ipc_sysctl.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
ipc/sem.c | 3 ++-
ipc/util.h | 9 ---------
5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
base-commit: 7be4bc52fd9e0e55dc9a2e0232b89427d2c4b614
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-29 5:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 5:03 Yingjie Wang [this message]
2026-10-29 5:03 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] ipc/sem: account dynamically allocated sops arrays to memcg Yingjie Wang
2026-10-29 5:03 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] ipc/sem: reject negative SEMOPM values Yingjie Wang
2026-10-29 5:03 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] ipc/sem: remove obsolete SEMOPM fragmentation warning Yingjie Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1793250194.git.x-professor@outlook.com \
--to=x-professor@outlook.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alx@kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=legion@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=vasily.averin@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®