From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: illofspeed <illofspeed@gmail.com>, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev
Cc: agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org, mpatocka@redhat.com,
bmarzins@redhat.com, hare@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] dm zoned: fix two idle reclaim problems
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 16:23:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d013ff89-a9f0-433a-9872-cdf4b055c84b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261010161613.396-1-illofspeed@gmail.com>
On 2026/10/10 18:16, illofspeed wrote:
> v2: no code changes. The only change is my author address: v1 went out on
> 2026-10-10 from my previous address. Please apply this version instead of v1.
>
> These patches fix two problems in dm-zoned's reclaim worker, found while
> running md RAID5 on three dm-zoned targets on 27 TB host-managed SMR drives
> (WD Ultrastar DC HC680), each target with a regular cache device.
>
> 1. On a target with cache zones and no free sequential zone, an idle
> target keeps copying random zones into other random zones, forever
> (patch 2; patch 1 makes the resulting -ENOSPC back off instead of
> spinning). After a full md rebuild every chunk is mapped, so this
> happens right after a rebuild: the idle member read and wrote about
> 72 MB/s nonstop for hours.
>
> 2. After a reclaim pass that ends while the target is busy, the idle poll
> is never re-armed, so zones filled under load are not reclaimed when the
> target goes idle (patch 3). Users notice it as "the buffer never drains";
> the workaround has been a timer sending "dmsetup message <dev> 0 reclaim".
>
> Testing: the three patches were built as an out-of-tree dm-zoned module for
> 7.2.6 (the changed code is identical in current master) and tested
> - on emulated host-managed drives (tcmu-runner ZBC handler) in a VM: the
> idle copy loop reproduced with the stock module (340 MB/s on an idle
> target, zone counters unchanged), 0 MB/s with the patches;
> - on the three real drives since 2026-10-05: crash test, three 1.5 TiB
> write benchmarks, and eight conversions between single-device and
> cache-device layouts; emptied zones were reclaimed within minutes of the
> targets going idle without the reclaim timer.
> - with a reproducer that needs no special hardware (scsi_debug zbc=managed,
> 64 MiB zones, plus a 1 GiB loop cache device): stock module ~600 MB/s of
> read+write on the idle target with unchanged zone counters, patched
> module 0 MB/s:
> https://github.com/illofspeed/synology-host-managed-smr/tree/main/repro
> Not done: a test on current master itself (only 7.2.6), and a rebuild onto a
> cached member with the patches (the first problem was seen after a rebuild
> with the stock module).
>
> Related, not addressed here: the double-free in dmz_load_sb() reported on
> dm-devel on 2026-05-30.
>
> The problems were found and the patches written with the help of an AI
> coding assistant (hence Assisted-by); the analysis, the tests on real
> hardware and this description were reviewed by me.
What changes from v1?
>
> illofspeed (3):
> dm zoned: back off when reclaim finds no destination zone
> dm zoned: do not reclaim a random zone into another random zone
> dm zoned: keep polling for idle reclaim after a reclaim pass
>
> drivers/md/dm-zoned-reclaim.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-11 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-10 16:16 illofspeed
2026-10-10 16:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dm zoned: back off when reclaim finds no destination zone illofspeed
2026-10-11 14:24 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-10-11 16:17 ` illofspeed
2026-10-11 16:32 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-10-11 16:47 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-10-10 16:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dm zoned: do not reclaim a random zone into another random zone illofspeed
2026-10-11 14:30 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-10-11 16:17 ` illofspeed
2026-10-10 16:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] dm zoned: keep polling for idle reclaim after a reclaim pass illofspeed
2026-10-11 14:31 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-10-11 16:17 ` illofspeed
2026-10-11 14:23 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2026-10-11 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] dm zoned: fix two idle reclaim problems Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d013ff89-a9f0-433a-9872-cdf4b055c84b@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=illofspeed@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®