From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [mm, slub] 0af8489b02: kernel_BUG_at_include/linux/mm.h
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 15:09:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d024b846-9282-4ecd-eafd-2e5571932a72@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y71t89JMgtRoNHM/@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
On 1/10/23 14:53, Oliver Sang wrote:
> hi all,
>
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 10:01:15PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 11:13:15AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>
>> > And if the rate at the parent (has it increased thanks to the
>> > DEBUG_PAGEALLOC?) is sufficient to bisect to the truly first bad commit. Thanks!
>>
>> got it. Thanks for suggestion!
>>
>> since 0af8489b02 is based on v6.1-rc2, we will test (both rectorture and boot)
>> with same config upon v6.1-rc2 to see if it's really clean there.
>> if so we will use dmesg.invalid_opcode:#[##] to trigger new bisect.
>>
>> will keep you updated. Thanks
>
> by more tests, we cannot make sure the v6.1-rc2 is clean, so we also checked
> v6.1-rc1 and v6.0. from results, we have low confidence that we can make a
> successful bisection based on them [1][2]. could you suggest?
So am I reading it right, that the probleam appears to be introduced between
v6.0 (0 failures) and v6.1-rc1 (>0 failures)? But agree that with such low
incidence, it's hard to bisect.
> a further information not sure if it's helpful, [1][2] are both i386 based.
> we also tried to run boot tests on x86_64 upon commit 0af8489b02, whatever
> with or without CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC/CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC_ENABLE_DEFAULT,
> we never obseve similar issues (also run 999 times).
Yeah it looks very much like something that manifests only on i386 (perhaps
only in QEMU as well?) and never x86_64.
What might be interesting then is v6.1-rc1 with further modified config to
enabled CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG and CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON. Maybe it will catch the
culprit sooner. Or maybe it will obscure the bug instead, unfortunately.
Thanks for all your effort!
> [1]
> boot results:
> =========================================================================================
> compiler/kconfig/rootfs/sleep/tbox_group/testcase:
> gcc-11/i386-randconfig-a012-20221226+CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC+CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC_ENABLE_DEFAULT/debian-11.1-i386-20220923.cgz/1/vm-snb/boot
>
> v6.0 v6.1-rc1 v6.1-rc2 56d5a2b9ba85a390473e86b4fe4 0af8489b0216fa1dd83e264bef8
> ---------------- --------------------------- --------------------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
> fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs
> | | | | | | | | |
> :999 0% 2:999 0% 1:999 1% 11:999 21% 208:999 dmesg.invalid_opcode:#[##]
> :999 0% :999 0% :999 0% 2:999 5% 51:999 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_include/linux/mm.h
> :999 0% 1:999 0% :999 0% 4:999 4% 40:999 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_include/linux/page-flags.h
> :999 0% 1:999 0% 1:999 0% 4:999 11% 111:999 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_lib/list_debug.c
> :999 0% :999 0% :999 0% :999 0% 2:999 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_mm/page_alloc.c
> :999 0% :999 0% :999 0% 1:999 0% 3:999 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_mm/usercopy.c
>
> [2]
> rcutorture results:
> =========================================================================================
> compiler/kconfig/rootfs/runtime/tbox_group/test/testcase/torture_type:
> gcc-11/i386-randconfig-a012-20221226+CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC+CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC_ENABLE_DEFAULT/debian-11.1-i386-20220923.cgz/300s/vm-snb/default/rcutorture/tasks-tracing
>
> v6.0 v6.1-rc1 v6.1-rc2 56d5a2b9ba85a390473e86b4fe4 0af8489b0216fa1dd83e264bef8
> ---------------- --------------------------- --------------------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
> fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs
> | | | | | | | | |
> :999 0% 3:999 0% :999 1% 8:998 20% 200:999 dmesg.invalid_opcode:#[##]
> :999 0% :999 0% :999 0% :998 5% 51:999 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_include/linux/mm.h
> :999 0% :999 0% :999 0% 3:998 4% 42:999 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_include/linux/page-flags.h
> :999 0% 3:999 0% :999 0% 4:998 10% 102:999 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_lib/list_debug.c
> :999 0% :999 0% :999 0% :998 0% 2:999 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_mm/page_alloc.c
> :999 0% :999 0% :999 0% 1:998 0% 3:999 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_mm/usercopy.c
>
>>
>> >
>> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-10 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-31 15:26 kernel test robot
2023-01-01 5:30 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-01-01 6:50 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-01-01 7:37 ` supervisor write access in kernel mode in __pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-01-01 11:08 ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-01-02 11:17 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-01-03 10:42 ` [linus:master] [mm, slub] 0af8489b02: kernel_BUG_at_include/linux/mm.h Vlastimil Babka
2023-01-03 13:46 ` Oliver Sang
2023-01-03 14:36 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-01-04 9:04 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-01-05 1:46 ` Oliver Sang
2023-01-05 13:59 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-01-05 14:47 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-01-09 14:16 ` Oliver Sang
2023-01-06 10:13 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-01-09 14:01 ` Oliver Sang
2023-01-09 14:04 ` Oliver Sang
2023-01-10 13:53 ` Oliver Sang
2023-01-10 14:09 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2023-01-11 2:26 ` Feng Tang
2023-01-11 10:52 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-01-12 7:47 ` Oliver Sang
2023-01-12 7:56 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-01-17 7:19 ` Oliver Sang
2023-01-12 8:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-01-03 15:31 ` A better dump_page() Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-03 23:07 ` David Rientjes
2023-01-03 23:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-05 15:19 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-01-05 15:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-06 17:28 ` [linus:master] [mm, slub] 0af8489b02: kernel_BUG_at_include/linux/mm.h Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-01-11 9:44 ` BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: f6ffe000 Hyeonggon Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d024b846-9282-4ecd-eafd-2e5571932a72@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®