From: "Ding, Shenghao" <shenghao-ding@ti.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: "broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com"
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"13564923607@139.com" <13564923607@139.com>,
"13916275206@139.com" <13916275206@139.com>,
"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Xu, Baojun" <baojun.xu@ti.com>,
"Baojun.Xu@fpt.com" <Baojun.Xu@fpt.com>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v2] ALSA: hda/tas2781: Fix the order of TAS2781 calibrated-data
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 22:06:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d032c064b5324641b19b3c0b31dcd2e2@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875xdzx5nn.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Thanks for your ref code
> > +/*
> > + * The order of calibrated-data writing is a bit different from the
> > +order
> > + * in UEFI. Here is the conversion to match the order of
> > +calibrated-data
> > + * writing.
> > + */
> > +static void cali_cnv(unsigned char *data, unsigned int base, int
> > +offset) {
> > + __be32 bedata[TASDEV_CALIB_N];
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + /* r0_reg */
> > + bedata[0] = cpu_to_be32(*(uint32_t *)&data[base]);
> > + /* r0_low_reg */
> > + bedata[1] = cpu_to_be32(*(uint32_t *)&data[base + 8]);
> > + /* invr0_reg */
> > + bedata[2] = cpu_to_be32(*(uint32_t *)&data[base + 4]);
> > + /* pow_reg */
> > + bedata[3] = cpu_to_be32(*(uint32_t *)&data[base + 12]);
> > + /* tlimit_reg */
> > + bedata[4] = cpu_to_be32(*(uint32_t *)&data[base + 16]);
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < TASDEV_CALIB_N; i++)
> > + memcpy(&data[offset + i * 4 + 1], &bedata[i],
> > + sizeof(bedata[i]));
> > +}
>
> IMO, this can be more readable when you use struct calidata, e.g.
>
> static void cali_cnv(unsigned char *data, unsigned int base, int offset) {
> struct calidata reg;
>
> reg.r0_reg = *(u32 *)&data[base]
> reg.r0_low_reg = *(u32 *)&data[base + 8]
> reg.invr0_reg = *(u32 *)&data[base + 4]
> reg.pow_reg = *(u32 *)&data[base + 12];
> reg.tlimit_reg = *(u32 *)&data[base + 16]);
>
> cpu_to_be32_array((__force __be32 *)(data + offset + 1), ®,
> TASDEV_CALIB_N);
> }
>
> ... or even simpler like:
>
> static void cali_cnv(unsigned char *data, unsigned int base, int offset) {
> struct calidata reg;
>
> memcpy(®, data, sizeof(reg));
> /* the data order has to be swapped between r0_low_reg and inv0_reg
> */
> swap(reg.r0_low_reg, reg.invr0_reg);
>
> cpu_to_be32_array((__force __be32 *)(data + offset + 1), ®,
> TASDEV_CALIB_N);
> }
I like this code so much. It's elegant simplicity.
Thanks,
Shenghao Ding
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-03 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-03 4:13 Shenghao Ding
2025-09-03 7:21 ` Takashi Iwai
2025-09-03 8:21 ` [EXTERNAL] " Ding, Shenghao
2025-09-03 9:10 ` Takashi Iwai
2025-09-03 22:06 ` Ding, Shenghao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d032c064b5324641b19b3c0b31dcd2e2@ti.com \
--to=shenghao-ding@ti.com \
--cc=13564923607@139.com \
--cc=13916275206@139.com \
--cc=Baojun.Xu@fpt.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=baojun.xu@ti.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®