From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>, Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
Cc: ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>, Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ocfs2: validate inline xattrs during inode block validation
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 16:57:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d05e492c-303a-4903-966e-53e6aacc54b4@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260622130332.2094018-2-zzzccc427@gmail.com>
On 6/22/26 9:03 PM, Cen Zhang wrote:
> ocfs2_validate_inode_block() verifies a dinode before OCFS2 users walk
> metadata from it, but inline xattr metadata is still checked only in
> some consumers. The current ibody helper validates the inline header
> placement and entry count before deriving the header from
> i_xattr_inline_size, but it does not reject entry name/value bounds from
> inode block validation.
>
> Extend the shared ibody helper with name/value bounds checks and call it
> from ocfs2_validate_inode_block(). Keep the get/list paths using the same
> helper before they derive pointers from i_xattr_inline_size so callers
> with an already-loaded dinode still get the same corruption check.
>
> Reject corrupted inline xattr metadata before ocfs2_xattr_ibody_get() or
> listxattr() can walk past the inline storage.
>
> Validation reproduced this kernel report:
> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in ocfs2_xattr_find_entry+0x5a/0x170
> Read of size 2 at addr ffff8881242a2000 by task python3/529
> Call Trace:
> dump_stack_lvl+0x66/0xa0
> print_report+0xce/0x630
> kasan_report+0xe0/0x110
> ocfs2_xattr_find_entry+0x5a/0x170
> ocfs2_xattr_get_nolock+0x20a/0x820
> ocfs2_xattr_get+0x10c/0x1e0
> __vfs_getxattr+0xe2/0x130
> vfs_getxattr+0x185/0x1b0
>
> Fixes: cf1d6c763fbc ("ocfs2: Add extended attribute support")
> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.5
> Signed-off-by: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/inode.c | 4 ++
> fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> fs/ocfs2/xattr.h | 2 +
> 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> index 662dbc845b8b..815bf3f659da 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> @@ -1608,6 +1608,10 @@ int ocfs2_validate_inode_block(struct super_block *sb,
> goto bail;
> }
>
> + rc = ocfs2_validate_inode_xattr(sb, bh->b_blocknr, di);
> + if (rc)
> + goto bail;
> +
> if (le16_to_cpu(di->i_dyn_features) & OCFS2_INLINE_DATA_FL) {
> struct ocfs2_inline_data *data = &di->id2.i_data;
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> index fcddd3c13acd..00900e65634d 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> @@ -950,39 +950,105 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_list_entries(struct inode *inode,
> return result;
> }
>
> -static int ocfs2_xattr_ibody_lookup_header(struct inode *inode,
> - struct ocfs2_dinode *di,
> - struct ocfs2_xattr_header **header)
> +static int ocfs2_validate_xattr_entries(struct super_block *sb, u64 blkno,
> + struct ocfs2_xattr_header *xh,
> + size_t storage_size,
> + const char *where)
Seems we can define a ocfs2_xattr_entry_type and pass in, then compute
the size inside ocfs2_validate_xattr_entries().
e.g.
enum ocfs2_xattr_entry_type {
OCFS2_XATTR_IBODY,
OCFS2_XATTR_BLOCK,
OCFS2_XATTR_BUCKET
};
And here 'where' is to identify inline xattr, xattr block or bucket.
Commonly, blkno is already sufficient to uniquely identifies the corrupt
block. So I'd rather drop it for simplification.
> {
> - u16 xattr_count;
> + u16 xattr_count = le16_to_cpu(xh->xh_count);
> size_t max_entries;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (storage_size < sizeof(*xh))
> + return ocfs2_error(sb,
> + "Invalid %s in block %llu: storage size %zu is too small\n",
> + where, (unsigned long long)blkno,
> + storage_size);
> +
> + max_entries = (storage_size - sizeof(*xh)) /
> + sizeof(struct ocfs2_xattr_entry);
> + if (xattr_count > max_entries) {
> + return ocfs2_error(sb,
> + "Invalid %s in block %llu: entry count %u exceeds maximum %zu\n",
> + where, (unsigned long long)blkno,
> + xattr_count, max_entries);
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < xattr_count; i++) {
> + struct ocfs2_xattr_entry *xe = &xh->xh_entries[i];
> + size_t name_offset = le16_to_cpu(xe->xe_name_offset);
> + size_t value_offset;
> +
> + if (name_offset > storage_size ||
> + xe->xe_name_len > storage_size - name_offset)
> + return ocfs2_error(sb,
> + "Invalid %s in block %llu: entry %d name is out of bounds\n",
> + where, (unsigned long long)blkno, i);
> +
> + value_offset = name_offset + OCFS2_XATTR_SIZE(xe->xe_name_len);
> + if (value_offset > storage_size)
> + return ocfs2_error(sb,
> + "Invalid %s in block %llu: entry %d value starts out of bounds\n",
> + where, (unsigned long long)blkno, i);
> +
> + if (ocfs2_xattr_is_local(xe)) {
> + if (le64_to_cpu(xe->xe_value_size) >
> + storage_size - value_offset)
> + return ocfs2_error(sb,
> + "Invalid %s in block %llu: entry %d value is out of bounds\n",
> + where,
> + (unsigned long long)blkno,
> + i);
> + } else if (sizeof(struct ocfs2_xattr_value_root) >
> + storage_size - value_offset) {
> + return ocfs2_error(sb,
> + "Invalid %s in block %llu: entry %d value root is out of bounds\n",
> + where, (unsigned long long)blkno, i);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ocfs2_validate_xattr_ibody_header(struct super_block *sb, u64 blkno,
> + struct ocfs2_dinode *di,
> + struct ocfs2_xattr_header **header)
> +{
> + struct ocfs2_xattr_header *xh;
> u16 inline_size = le16_to_cpu(di->i_xattr_inline_size);
>
> - if (inline_size > inode->i_sb->s_blocksize ||
> + if (inline_size > sb->s_blocksize ||
> inline_size < sizeof(struct ocfs2_xattr_header)) {
> - ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb,
> - "Invalid xattr inline size %u in inode %llu\n",
> - inline_size,
> - (unsigned long long)OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_blkno);
> - return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> + return ocfs2_error(sb,
> + "Invalid inode %llu: xattr inline size %u\n",
> + (unsigned long long)blkno, inline_size);
> }
>
> - *header = (struct ocfs2_xattr_header *)
> - ((void *)di + inode->i_sb->s_blocksize - inline_size);
> + xh = (struct ocfs2_xattr_header *)
> + ((void *)di + sb->s_blocksize - inline_size);
> + if (header)
> + *header = xh;
>
> - xattr_count = le16_to_cpu((*header)->xh_count);
> - max_entries = (inline_size - sizeof(struct ocfs2_xattr_header)) /
> - sizeof(struct ocfs2_xattr_entry);
> + return ocfs2_validate_xattr_entries(sb, blkno, xh, inline_size,
> + "inline xattr");
> +}
>
> - if (xattr_count > max_entries) {
> - ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb,
> - "xattr entry count %u exceeds maximum %zu in inode %llu\n",
> - xattr_count, max_entries,
> - (unsigned long long)OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_blkno);
> - return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> - }
> +int ocfs2_validate_inode_xattr(struct super_block *sb, u64 blkno,
> + struct ocfs2_dinode *di)
> +{
> + if (!(le16_to_cpu(di->i_dyn_features) & OCFS2_INLINE_XATTR_FL))
> + return 0;
>
> - return 0;
> + return ocfs2_validate_xattr_ibody_header(sb, blkno, di, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static int ocfs2_xattr_ibody_lookup_header(struct inode *inode,
> + struct ocfs2_dinode *di,
> + struct ocfs2_xattr_header **header)
> +{
> + return ocfs2_validate_xattr_ibody_header(inode->i_sb,
> + OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_blkno,
> + di, header);
> }
Since ocfs2_validate_inode_block() already validated at buffer read
time, it seems this per-operation re-check is wasted work.
Thanks,
Joseph
>
> int ocfs2_has_inline_xattr_value_outside(struct inode *inode,
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.h b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.h
> index 65e9aa743919..6b7589941315 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.h
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ int ocfs2_xattr_set_handle(handle_t *, struct inode *, struct buffer_head *,
> struct ocfs2_alloc_context *);
> int ocfs2_has_inline_xattr_value_outside(struct inode *inode,
> struct ocfs2_dinode *di);
> +int ocfs2_validate_inode_xattr(struct super_block *sb, u64 blkno,
> + struct ocfs2_dinode *di);
> int ocfs2_xattr_remove(struct inode *, struct buffer_head *);
> int ocfs2_init_security_get(struct inode *, struct inode *,
> const struct qstr *,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-22 13:03 [PATCH v4 0/2] ocfs2: validate xattr metadata bounds Cen Zhang
2026-06-22 13:03 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ocfs2: validate inline xattrs during inode block validation Cen Zhang
2026-06-23 8:57 ` Joseph Qi [this message]
2026-06-24 10:25 ` Cen Zhang
2026-06-22 13:03 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ocfs2: validate external xattr entries when reading metadata Cen Zhang
2026-06-25 9:00 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] ocfs2: validate xattr entry bounds Cen Zhang
2026-06-25 9:00 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] ocfs2: validate inline xattrs during inode block validation Cen Zhang
2026-06-25 9:01 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] ocfs2: validate external xattr entries when reading metadata Cen Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d05e492c-303a-4903-966e-53e6aacc54b4@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=heming.zhao@suse.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=zzzccc427@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®