From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2E2C3524D for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 12:32:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 850902084E for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 12:32:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=xilinx.onmicrosoft.com header.i=@xilinx.onmicrosoft.com header.b="Njvn9X2T" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727183AbgBDMcX (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Feb 2020 07:32:23 -0500 Received: from mail-dm6nam11on2071.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.223.71]:36161 "EHLO NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727119AbgBDMcX (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Feb 2020 07:32:23 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Bl1lPnJp6q+Z0uheCuVj4KHIxU6G5FcXncPlfGo2JWOGWa/KxVqbbikvL1ct7nyMbPeZnx5w9srBuhyOfH/+wlEEWyR+yBlhPRvVpecwCkljg37Yx3HZaEQfHHz5i/KnhNKYq+iDct/OrMajyvE15r1mIOYnjOot7+VFQEzRLUd6f/g56s/bf4fZzlD4zDNMPWEcNkwPK3GB/iNkuwev5j4trzEDeUME82HSSMF0Qm0zeiizc5ArPlM4vpZm0QlF2AvPAC9HreVSEEwO8Em1bk5eUX8mWw5MlWBtt0vH+HWX2PAlUaTLtAy83Wn68HQXCX+naBL8/e89Mvnv0ZLCNw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Uq7qUjiZAP+3yo+UE4aGzmYa/lilal1ogWwn8TJfQ4Q=; b=HKP2EUIPnhGCaSUIybXivJm3CmvqejG1LofVnY4yTYzb40o/mhPhv7pX7HaaFkN5+CneJPnFLQmva9jlGpmd4KXBSgnE5wi24kA/rrdX5Z0/rlgKK3mE8sW4wnlyYLN+joQ4hLvQTkANGDp839TDbEsXcgN7RZqnYvaTpowvWeciEwi+H715YlGtiZk/xASbp3V/3p9KYeN06wX6TfhElnLRtjDJlwrRs4RTSpT9f42XA9Xn/CkBNTCzTL+8fSBmrrah1Np6I97mLQsIFizE+cUsyOuKW+f//DrYkv5aSmeklPv/K7H/9D2neieJXW72dICTdm70s7IhjXvgOi/mUA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 149.199.60.83) smtp.rcpttodomain=vger.kernel.org smtp.mailfrom=xilinx.com; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=xilinx.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xilinx.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-xilinx-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Uq7qUjiZAP+3yo+UE4aGzmYa/lilal1ogWwn8TJfQ4Q=; b=Njvn9X2T+s8wwYpMNyIDKcglkexAKtHLruqA4vJ7ek9qq9Uo4Imnxq/CsA5DoSaW7scjhOtGUKjVuTDPAVvQg2dsr6tm+R+COfuYaOO2AxZgltfH8dWD3LW1HahIEsNCidS2K1BWYqtLnk7xdNoMmTHzhM49liRKMaOhRTV7rqM= Received: from BN7PR02CA0035.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:20::48) by BYAPR02MB4280.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:5a::29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2686.32; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 12:31:40 +0000 Received: from BL2NAM02FT023.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:f400:7e46::202) by BN7PR02CA0035.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:408:20::48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2686.29 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 12:31:40 +0000 Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 149.199.60.83) smtp.mailfrom=xilinx.com; vger.kernel.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;vger.kernel.org; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=xilinx.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of xilinx.com designates 149.199.60.83 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=149.199.60.83; helo=xsj-pvapsmtpgw01; Received: from xsj-pvapsmtpgw01 (149.199.60.83) by BL2NAM02FT023.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.77.72) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.20.2686.25 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 12:31:39 +0000 Received: from unknown-38-66.xilinx.com ([149.199.38.66] helo=xsj-pvapsmtp01) by xsj-pvapsmtpgw01 with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1iyxMg-0001sl-QH; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 04:31:38 -0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by xsj-pvapsmtp01 with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1iyxMb-0002fh-M8; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 04:31:33 -0800 Received: from [172.30.17.107] by xsj-pvapsmtp01 with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1iyxMW-0002eU-6U; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 04:31:28 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sdhci: arasan: Remove quirk for broken base clock To: Ulf Hansson , Michal Simek , Manish Narani Cc: Adrian Hunter , jolly.shah@xilinx.com, rajan.vaja@xilinx.com, nava.manne@xilinx.com, tejas.patel@xilinx.com, Linux ARM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" References: <1579602095-30060-1-git-send-email-manish.narani@xilinx.com> <1579602095-30060-5-git-send-email-manish.narani@xilinx.com> <99fd3904-37fa-f070-f7ac-e1dcb5bf43de@intel.com> <0d7e7a44-91dc-baef-5dcf-4ff683e98581@xilinx.com> From: Michal Simek Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 13:31:25 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1224-8.2.0.1013-23620.005 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes;Yes X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-Office365-Filtering-HT: Tenant X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:149.199.60.83;IPV:;CTRY:US;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(346002)(136003)(39860400002)(396003)(376002)(199004)(189003)(110136005)(54906003)(5660300002)(316002)(70586007)(31696002)(53546011)(36756003)(70206006)(26005)(186003)(81156014)(6636002)(8676002)(81166006)(31686004)(9786002)(8936002)(426003)(2906002)(2616005)(336012)(44832011)(4326008)(478600001)(356004)(6666004);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:BYAPR02MB4280;H:xsj-pvapsmtpgw01;FPR:;SPF:Pass;LANG:en;PTR:unknown-60-83.xilinx.com;A:1;MX:1; X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: c6500944-a407-4dc2-f2c6-08d7a96e2f20 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: BYAPR02MB4280: X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:10000; X-Forefront-PRVS: 03030B9493 X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: /QlK9r4YPVWtoPBvH2og6Y1u0s5HTLC9uZxAFiVEKyIiZV252jYpDLW7Ju2E3VCWc/viTCLaWeH4xPTFb74qGpwz1XGN8jDZ7Iby/om7MlxrYbMstNhLOFWKeW6ASLv2kfRce0VxU3MXHL0C4xUpY8dOirR9vs4hF98X3dCYZ2Mx6gi05STTXODlFTOJAzO8pmw8/n4JFkf2D+KaCDDMZ/tPBxOsO0nvXdi46ZxYdUjtz/2Imgh3NhRsJrMEqNRzOBKrpJJf8ODb2m1C/D4cccTvMEtjoyswWKPWK/TNkcSKw2FHDx6R262hoAoJTpzCcX2+YR472LNnkJ5QBZVBTLy6CrP07Rh8fTOA6V5xdmtXH8r5jiEJCeH27aAqmnm7yD901a7VpHaldD/Ir6AIC2T324f50M0lls9rjn/U336as50aG/PTVMQ1eUIZAwXK X-OriginatorOrg: xilinx.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Feb 2020 12:31:39.6628 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c6500944-a407-4dc2-f2c6-08d7a96e2f20 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c;Ip=[149.199.60.83];Helo=[xsj-pvapsmtpgw01] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR02MB4280 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04. 02. 20 13:29, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 12:42, Michal Simek wrote: >> >> On 03. 02. 20 12:31, Adrian Hunter wrote: >>> On 21/01/20 12:21 pm, Manish Narani wrote: >>>> This patch removes quirk which indicates a broken base clock. This was >>>> making the kernel report wrong base clock of ~187MHz instead of 200MHz >>>> even as the measurement on the hardware was showing 200MHz. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Manish Narani >>>> State: pending >>> >>> Huh? >> >> It shouldn't be here. It is internal patch labeling. >> Manish: Please send v2 with all lines you got and remove this above. > > No need for a resend, I can fix this before applying, which will be > when rc1 is out. > >> >>> >>> Otherwise: >>> >>> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter >> >> These patches requires firmware changes. Feel free to take it directly >> via your tree. If you want me to take it via arm-soc tree please let me >> know. > > Thanks, I pick them up via my mmc tree then. ok. Please let me know if there is any conflict. It should be simple add. Thanks, Michal