From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
Cc: jolsa@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
adrian.hunter@intel.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com, alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com,
vitaly.slobodskoy@intel.com, pavel.gerasimov@intel.com,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] perf tools: Add hw_idx in struct branch_stack
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 11:07:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d0888c78-a610-57e4-245b-170db295d93c@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200304154552.GB2854@kernel.org>
On 3/4/2020 10:45 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 10:49:02AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> Em Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 08:30:00AM -0800, kan.liang@linux.intel.com escreveu:
>>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>>> The low level index of raw branch records for the most recent branch can
>>> be recorded in a sample with PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX
>>> branch_sample_type. Extend struct branch_stack to support it.
>
>>> However, if the PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX is not applied, only nr and
>>> entries[] will be output by kernel. The pointer of entries[] could be
>>> wrong, since the output format is different with new struct branch_stack.
>>> Add a variable no_hw_idx in struct perf_sample to indicate whether the
>>> hw_idx is output.
>>> Add get_branch_entry() to return corresponding pointer of entries[0].
>
>> This should be broken up in at least two patches, one that syncs
>> tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h with the kernel, and another to do
>> what this changeset log message states, I'll do it this time to expedite
>> processing of this patchset, please do it that way next time.
>
Thanks. I will keep it in mind.
> So, after doing that split I'm also suggesting/tentatively applying this
> patch on top of it, to keep the naming convention we have in tools/perf,
> and also the 'static' to that inline,
Thanks. The changes look good to me.
Thanks,
Kan
> please holler if you disagree,
> I'll put the end result in a branch for further visualization/comments.
>
> At some point these functions obtaining stuff from a 'struct perf_sample' to
> tools/lib/perf/ (aka libperf), so better go doing proper namespacing,
> etc, right Jiri?
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> index acf3107bbda2..656b347f6dd8 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> @@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ static int perf_sample__fprintf_brstack(struct perf_sample *sample,
> struct perf_event_attr *attr, FILE *fp)
> {
> struct branch_stack *br = sample->branch_stack;
> - struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
> + struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
> struct addr_location alf, alt;
> u64 i, from, to;
> int printed = 0;
> @@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ static int perf_sample__fprintf_brstacksym(struct perf_sample *sample,
> struct perf_event_attr *attr, FILE *fp)
> {
> struct branch_stack *br = sample->branch_stack;
> - struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
> + struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
> struct addr_location alf, alt;
> u64 i, from, to;
> int printed = 0;
> @@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ static int perf_sample__fprintf_brstackoff(struct perf_sample *sample,
> struct perf_event_attr *attr, FILE *fp)
> {
> struct branch_stack *br = sample->branch_stack;
> - struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
> + struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
> struct addr_location alf, alt;
> u64 i, from, to;
> int printed = 0;
> @@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ static int perf_sample__fprintf_brstackinsn(struct perf_sample *sample,
> struct machine *machine, FILE *fp)
> {
> struct branch_stack *br = sample->branch_stack;
> - struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
> + struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
> u64 start, end;
> int i, insn, len, nr, ilen, printed = 0;
> struct perf_insn x;
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/branch.h b/tools/perf/util/branch.h
> index 014c3cd4cb32..154a05cd03af 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/branch.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/branch.h
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ struct branch_stack {
> * Check whether the hw_idx is available,
> * and return the corresponding pointer of entries[0].
> */
> -inline struct branch_entry *get_branch_entry(struct perf_sample *sample)
> +static inline struct branch_entry *perf_sample__branch_entries(struct perf_sample *sample)
> {
> u64 *entry = (u64 *)sample->branch_stack;
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hist.c b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
> index 808ca27bd5cf..e74a5acf66d9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/hist.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
> @@ -2584,7 +2584,7 @@ void hist__account_cycles(struct branch_stack *bs, struct addr_location *al,
> u64 *total_cycles)
> {
> struct branch_info *bi;
> - struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
> + struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
>
> /* If we have branch cycles always annotate them. */
> if (bs && bs->nr && entries[0].flags.cycles) {
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> index b0623f99fb9c..fd14f1489802 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> @@ -2081,7 +2081,7 @@ struct branch_info *sample__resolve_bstack(struct perf_sample *sample,
> {
> unsigned int i;
> const struct branch_stack *bs = sample->branch_stack;
> - struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
> + struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
> struct branch_info *bi = calloc(bs->nr, sizeof(struct branch_info));
>
> if (!bi)
> @@ -2186,7 +2186,7 @@ static int resolve_lbr_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
> /* LBR only affects the user callchain */
> if (i != chain_nr) {
> struct branch_stack *lbr_stack = sample->branch_stack;
> - struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
> + struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
> int lbr_nr = lbr_stack->nr, j, k;
> bool branch;
> struct branch_flags *flags;
> @@ -2281,7 +2281,7 @@ static int thread__resolve_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
> int max_stack)
> {
> struct branch_stack *branch = sample->branch_stack;
> - struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
> + struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
> struct ip_callchain *chain = sample->callchain;
> int chain_nr = 0;
> u8 cpumode = PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER;
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c b/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c
> index 02b6c87c5abe..8c1b27cd8b99 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c
> @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ static PyObject *python_process_brstack(struct perf_sample *sample,
> struct thread *thread)
> {
> struct branch_stack *br = sample->branch_stack;
> - struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
> + struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
> PyObject *pylist;
> u64 i;
>
> @@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ static PyObject *python_process_brstacksym(struct perf_sample *sample,
> struct thread *thread)
> {
> struct branch_stack *br = sample->branch_stack;
> - struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
> + struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
> PyObject *pylist;
> u64 i;
> char bf[512];
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
> index dab985e3f136..055b00abd56d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
> @@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ static void callchain__lbr_callstack_printf(struct perf_sample *sample)
> {
> struct ip_callchain *callchain = sample->callchain;
> struct branch_stack *lbr_stack = sample->branch_stack;
> - struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
> + struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
> u64 kernel_callchain_nr = callchain->nr;
> unsigned int i;
>
> @@ -1069,7 +1069,7 @@ static void callchain__printf(struct evsel *evsel,
>
> static void branch_stack__printf(struct perf_sample *sample, bool callstack)
> {
> - struct branch_entry *entries = get_branch_entry(sample);
> + struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
> uint64_t i;
>
> printf("%s: nr:%" PRIu64 "\n",
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-04 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-28 16:29 [PATCH 00/12] Stitch LBR call stack (Perf Tools) kan.liang
2020-02-28 16:30 ` [PATCH 01/12] perf tools: Add hw_idx in struct branch_stack kan.liang
2020-03-04 13:49 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-03-04 15:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-03-04 16:07 ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2020-03-19 14:10 ` [tip: perf/core] tools headers UAPI: Update tools's copy of linux/perf_event.h tip-bot2 for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-03-10 0:42 ` [PATCH 01/12] perf tools: Add hw_idx in struct branch_stack Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-03-10 12:53 ` Liang, Kan
2020-03-19 14:10 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-02-28 16:30 ` [PATCH 02/12] perf tools: Support PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX kan.liang
2020-03-05 20:25 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-03-05 21:02 ` Liang, Kan
2020-03-05 23:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-03-19 14:10 ` [tip: perf/core] perf evsel: " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-02-28 16:30 ` [PATCH 03/12] perf header: Add check for event attr kan.liang
2020-03-19 14:10 ` [tip: perf/core] perf header: Add check for unexpected use of reserved membrs in " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-02-28 16:30 ` [PATCH 04/12] perf pmu: Add support for PMU capabilities kan.liang
2020-02-28 16:30 ` [PATCH 05/12] perf header: Support CPU " kan.liang
2020-02-28 16:30 ` [PATCH 06/12] perf machine: Refine the function for LBR call stack reconstruction kan.liang
2020-02-28 16:30 ` [PATCH 07/12] perf tools: Stitch LBR call stack kan.liang
2020-02-28 16:30 ` [PATCH 08/12] perf report: Add option to enable the LBR stitching approach kan.liang
2020-02-28 16:30 ` [PATCH 09/12] perf script: " kan.liang
2020-02-28 16:30 ` [PATCH 10/12] perf top: " kan.liang
2020-02-28 16:30 ` [PATCH 11/12] perf c2c: " kan.liang
2020-02-28 16:30 ` [PATCH 12/12] perf hist: Add fast path for duplicate entries check approach kan.liang
2020-03-04 13:33 ` [PATCH 00/12] Stitch LBR call stack (Perf Tools) Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-03-06 9:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-03-06 19:13 ` Liang, Kan
2020-03-06 20:06 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-03-09 13:27 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-03-09 13:42 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d0888c78-a610-57e4-245b-170db295d93c@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=pavel.gerasimov@intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vitaly.slobodskoy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome