From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] nvmet: Introduce common execute function for get_log_page and identify
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:40:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d0ab4459-80c1-a722-ff75-269b0e61da19@deltatee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191024220119.GA25484@redsun51.ssa.fujisawa.hgst.com>
On 2019-10-24 4:01 p.m., Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:18:20AM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>> On 2019-10-23 7:17 p.m., Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>
>>> First signoff needs to be the From line picked up by git. I don't really
>>> care if you keep my attribution or not, but if you do it needs From
>>> line for me as the first theing in the mail body, and if not it
>>> should drop by signoff and just say based on a patch from me.
>>>
>>> Otherwise the series looks fine.
>>
>> Ok, understood. Do you want me to fix this up in a v2? Or can you fix it
>> up when you pick up the patches?
>
> I'll adjust with the commit. Just let me know which way you'd like to go,
> whether attribute author to Christoph or use the "Based-on-a-patch-by:"
> option.
Attribute the author to Christoph. It was all pretty much verbatim from
the draft patch he sent anyway. I just split it up and tested it.
Thanks,
Logan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-24 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-23 16:35 [PATCH 0/7] Remove data_len field from the nvmet_req struct Logan Gunthorpe
2019-10-23 16:35 ` [PATCH 1/7] nvmet-tcp: Don't check data_len in nvmet_tcp_map_data() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-10-24 1:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-23 16:35 ` [PATCH 2/7] nvmet-tcp: Don't set the request's data_len Logan Gunthorpe
2019-10-24 1:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-23 16:35 ` [PATCH 3/7] nvmet: Introduce common execute function for get_log_page and identify Logan Gunthorpe
2019-10-23 20:31 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-10-24 1:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-24 17:18 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-10-24 22:01 ` Keith Busch
2019-10-24 22:40 ` Logan Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-10-23 16:35 ` [PATCH 4/7] nvmet: Cleanup discovery execute handlers Logan Gunthorpe
2019-10-23 16:35 ` [PATCH 5/7] nvmet: Introduce nvmet_dsm_len() helper Logan Gunthorpe
2019-10-23 20:31 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-10-23 16:35 ` [PATCH 6/7] nvmet: Remove the data_len field from the nvmet_req struct Logan Gunthorpe
2019-10-23 16:35 ` [PATCH 7/7] nvmet: Open code nvmet_req_execute() Logan Gunthorpe
2019-10-23 20:34 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2019-10-25 0:20 ` [PATCH 0/7] Remove data_len field from the nvmet_req struct Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d0ab4459-80c1-a722-ff75-269b0e61da19@deltatee.com \
--to=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=sbates@raithlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®