mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
	jmill@asu.edu, peterz@infradead.org, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/fred: Remove ENDBR64 from FRED entry points
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 14:57:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d0cac7d8-3036-4241-b11c-f005224daefd@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5a7d108-f900-4a63-8116-c9eb54171976@intel.com>

On 2025-08-13 14:07, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 7/15/25 23:33, Xin Li (Intel) wrote:
>> The FRED specification has been changed in v9.0 to state that there
>> is no need for FRED event handlers to begin with ENDBR64, because
>> in the presence of supervisor indirect branch tracking, FRED event
>> delivery does not enter the WAIT_FOR_ENDBRANCH state.
>>
>> As a result, remove ENDBR64 from FRED entry points.
> 
> So, the spec is being updated or has been updated to reflect the new
> architecture, right?
> 
> Remind me, are there no FRED systems out in the wild today, so we don't
> have to worry about breaking anything?

Correct. The FRED v9 spec contains this change.

All production hardware and late pre-production hardware will have this.

	-hpa


      reply	other threads:[~2025-08-13 21:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-16  6:33 Xin Li (Intel)
2025-08-11 22:48 ` Xin Li
2025-08-13 21:07 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-13 21:57   ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d0cac7d8-3036-4241-b11c-f005224daefd@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jmill@asu.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xin@zytor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®