From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 15/17] rxrpc: Organise connection security to use a union
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 12:25:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d0d1edf746b8f50ca8897478a5e76a006e5d36ed.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160616230898.830164.7298470680786861832.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 20:11 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Organise the security information in the rxrpc_connection struct to use a
> union to allow for different data for different security classes.
Is there a known future purpose to this?
> diff --git a/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h b/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
> @@ -448,9 +448,15 @@ struct rxrpc_connection {
> struct list_head proc_link; /* link in procfs list */
> struct list_head link; /* link in master connection list */
> struct sk_buff_head rx_queue; /* received conn-level packets */
> +
> const struct rxrpc_security *security; /* applied security module */
> - struct crypto_sync_skcipher *cipher; /* encryption handle */
> - struct rxrpc_crypt csum_iv; /* packet checksum base */
> + union {
> + struct {
> + struct crypto_sync_skcipher *cipher; /* encryption handle */
> + struct rxrpc_crypt csum_iv; /* packet checksum base */
> + u32 nonce; /* response re-use preventer */
> + } rxkad;
> + };
It seems no other follow-on patch in the series uses this nameless union.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-23 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-23 20:10 [PATCH net 00/17] rxrpc: Prelude to gssapi support David Howells
2020-11-23 20:10 ` [PATCH net-next 01/17] keys: Provide the original description to the key preparser David Howells
2020-11-23 20:10 ` [PATCH net-next 02/17] rxrpc: Remove the rxk5 security class as it's now defunct David Howells
2020-11-23 20:10 ` [PATCH net-next 03/17] rxrpc: List the held token types in the key description in /proc/keys David Howells
2020-11-23 20:10 ` [PATCH net-next 04/17] rxrpc: Support keys with multiple authentication tokens David Howells
2020-11-23 20:10 ` [PATCH net-next 05/17] rxrpc: Don't retain the server key in the connection David Howells
2020-11-23 20:10 ` [PATCH net-next 06/17] rxrpc: Split the server key type (rxrpc_s) into its own file David Howells
2020-11-23 20:10 ` [PATCH net-next 07/17] rxrpc: Hand server key parsing off to the security class David Howells
2020-11-23 20:11 ` [PATCH net-next 08/17] rxrpc: Don't leak the service-side session key to userspace David Howells
2020-11-23 20:11 ` [PATCH net-next 09/17] rxrpc: Allow security classes to give more info on server keys David Howells
2020-11-23 20:11 ` [PATCH net-next 10/17] rxrpc: Make the parsing of xdr payloads more coherent David Howells
2020-11-23 20:11 ` [PATCH net-next 11/17] rxrpc: Ignore unknown tokens in key payload unless no known tokens David Howells
2020-11-23 20:11 ` [PATCH net-next 12/17] rxrpc: Fix example key name in a comment David Howells
2020-11-23 20:11 ` [PATCH net-next 13/17] rxrpc: Merge prime_packet_security into init_connection_security David Howells
2020-11-23 20:11 ` [PATCH net-next 14/17] rxrpc: Don't reserve security header in Tx DATA skbuff David Howells
2020-11-23 20:11 ` [PATCH net-next 15/17] rxrpc: Organise connection security to use a union David Howells
2020-11-23 20:25 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2020-11-23 21:08 ` David Howells
2020-11-23 20:11 ` [PATCH net-next 16/17] rxrpc: rxkad: Don't use pskb_pull() to advance through the response packet David Howells
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH net-next 17/17] rxrpc: Ask the security class how much space to allow in a packet David Howells
2020-11-24 20:08 ` [PATCH net 00/17] rxrpc: Prelude to gssapi support Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d0d1edf746b8f50ca8897478a5e76a006e5d36ed.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®