mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 15/17] rxrpc: Organise connection security to use a union
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 12:25:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d0d1edf746b8f50ca8897478a5e76a006e5d36ed.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160616230898.830164.7298470680786861832.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 20:11 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Organise the security information in the rxrpc_connection struct to use a
> union to allow for different data for different security classes.

Is there a known future purpose to this?

> diff --git a/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h b/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h

> @@ -448,9 +448,15 @@ struct rxrpc_connection {
>  	struct list_head	proc_link;	/* link in procfs list */
>  	struct list_head	link;		/* link in master connection list */
>  	struct sk_buff_head	rx_queue;	/* received conn-level packets */
> +
>  	const struct rxrpc_security *security;	/* applied security module */
> -	struct crypto_sync_skcipher *cipher;	/* encryption handle */
> -	struct rxrpc_crypt	csum_iv;	/* packet checksum base */
> +	union {
> +		struct {
> +			struct crypto_sync_skcipher *cipher;	/* encryption handle */
> +			struct rxrpc_crypt csum_iv;	/* packet checksum base */
> +			u32	nonce;		/* response re-use preventer */
> +		} rxkad;
> +	};

It seems no other follow-on patch in the series uses this nameless union.


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-23 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-23 20:10 [PATCH net 00/17] rxrpc: Prelude to gssapi support David Howells
2020-11-23 20:10 ` [PATCH net-next 01/17] keys: Provide the original description to the key preparser David Howells
2020-11-23 20:10 ` [PATCH net-next 02/17] rxrpc: Remove the rxk5 security class as it's now defunct David Howells
2020-11-23 20:10 ` [PATCH net-next 03/17] rxrpc: List the held token types in the key description in /proc/keys David Howells
2020-11-23 20:10 ` [PATCH net-next 04/17] rxrpc: Support keys with multiple authentication tokens David Howells
2020-11-23 20:10 ` [PATCH net-next 05/17] rxrpc: Don't retain the server key in the connection David Howells
2020-11-23 20:10 ` [PATCH net-next 06/17] rxrpc: Split the server key type (rxrpc_s) into its own file David Howells
2020-11-23 20:10 ` [PATCH net-next 07/17] rxrpc: Hand server key parsing off to the security class David Howells
2020-11-23 20:11 ` [PATCH net-next 08/17] rxrpc: Don't leak the service-side session key to userspace David Howells
2020-11-23 20:11 ` [PATCH net-next 09/17] rxrpc: Allow security classes to give more info on server keys David Howells
2020-11-23 20:11 ` [PATCH net-next 10/17] rxrpc: Make the parsing of xdr payloads more coherent David Howells
2020-11-23 20:11 ` [PATCH net-next 11/17] rxrpc: Ignore unknown tokens in key payload unless no known tokens David Howells
2020-11-23 20:11 ` [PATCH net-next 12/17] rxrpc: Fix example key name in a comment David Howells
2020-11-23 20:11 ` [PATCH net-next 13/17] rxrpc: Merge prime_packet_security into init_connection_security David Howells
2020-11-23 20:11 ` [PATCH net-next 14/17] rxrpc: Don't reserve security header in Tx DATA skbuff David Howells
2020-11-23 20:11 ` [PATCH net-next 15/17] rxrpc: Organise connection security to use a union David Howells
2020-11-23 20:25   ` Joe Perches [this message]
2020-11-23 21:08   ` David Howells
2020-11-23 20:11 ` [PATCH net-next 16/17] rxrpc: rxkad: Don't use pskb_pull() to advance through the response packet David Howells
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH net-next 17/17] rxrpc: Ask the security class how much space to allow in a packet David Howells
2020-11-24 20:08 ` [PATCH net 00/17] rxrpc: Prelude to gssapi support Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d0d1edf746b8f50ca8897478a5e76a006e5d36ed.camel@perches.com \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®