From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE9D256C7B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741695381; cv=none; b=duFXj3vt1T9iY63JYWbIhEmTzLARiC+W3OJeN1ZArpfJZkNScfV4JW/GRU4/PzcrUL1tR2+lnffPKaFzlqYT6jY4EcUHnJuRqFKs7/pLEZqSEikETxdS9iM3HhxhrqC5gc1Bpi0tIbUSZL7YGs9Tf4n5mTkrUKXwM1lUMA9qYZo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741695381; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4E4NoPyd1Ub/ueGYWUZs7KKEzoEeAJ7K9hKV7Ejfseg=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=eM6Kk5j+OXPd+NDsNL3E8kGKS0k4+ZQeFBsD9+Z1LrFYFComkOvnMKY0knHEagj6MslB+PSZvB0wXScD+rvRIPwcmm2vmHpWMGE9I6MjH9XKJxt+wUPzswHrLXStewKLpaWealAfU13l4jugo8ELXJA6yA0en3aczrsapPqEiBQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E291762; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 05:16:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.197.49] (eglon.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 971583F673; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 05:16:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:16:11 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/49] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code to /fs/resctrl To: Peter Newman Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Reinette Chatre , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , H Peter Anvin , Babu Moger , shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, D Scott Phillips OS , carl@os.amperecomputing.com, lcherian@marvell.com, bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles , Xin Hao , dfustini@baylibre.com, amitsinght@marvell.com, David Hildenbrand , Rex Nie , Dave Martin , Koba Ko , Shanker Donthineni , fenghuay@nvidia.com References: <20250228195913.24895-1-james.morse@arm.com> Content-Language: en-GB From: James Morse In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Peter, On 03/03/2025 10:14, Peter Newman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 8:59 PM James Morse wrote: >> >> Changes since v6?: >> * All the excitement is in patch 37, turns out there are two rmdir() paths >> that don't join up. >> The last eight patches are new: >> * The python script has been replaced with the patch that it generates, see >> the bare branch below if you want to regenerate it. >> * There have been comments on the followup to the generated patch, those are >> included here - I suggest they be squashed into the generated patch. >> * This version includes some checkpatch linting from Dave. >> >> --- >> This series renames functions and moves code around. With the >> exception of invalid configurations for the configurable-events, there should >> be no changes in behaviour caused by this series. It is now possible for >> throttle_mode to report 'undefined', but no known platform will do this. >> >> The driving pattern is to make things like struct rdtgroup private to resctrl. >> Features like pseudo-lock aren't going to work on arm64, the ability to disable >> it at compile time is added. >> >> After this, I can start posting the MPAM driver to make use of resctrl on arm64. >> (What's MPAM? See the cover letter of the first series. [1]) >> >> This series is based on v6.14-rc3 and can be retrieved from: >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/morse/linux.git mpam/move_to_fs/v7 >> or for those who want to regnerate the patch that moves all the code: >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/morse/linux.git mpam/move_to_fs/v7_bare > I applied the series successfully and ran through my usual assortment > of container management-oriented testcases on the following > implementations: > * AMD EPYC 7B12 64-Core Processor Great! This is something I've not managed to get my hands on. > * Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6268CL CPU @ 2.80GHz > > Everything looked good. > > Tested-by: Peter Newman Thanks! James