From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932457AbWCHUrR (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2006 15:47:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932463AbWCHUrQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2006 15:47:16 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.204]:17000 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932457AbWCHUrQ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2006 15:47:16 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qwsDRKPIE5SwIrhyt7a7Eg04oHemxYEdlBpN3red6CVFbU8JwuxHC9yEgJjykqAyMunkrAWdgn29DJJf3F/8uzZmjHF4PeakoaG3hGmOltzy3JBkRTFB7VAgDNVxVkKAwUZeDDZqBeJ2UKXasxGLywoVQrCDFI6/M8t2bCSTvaU= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 15:47:15 -0500 From: "Dmitry Torokhov" Reply-To: dtor_core@ameritech.net To: "Matheus Izvekov" Subject: Re: usbkbd not reporting unknown keys Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <305c16960603081225m68c26ff7wd3b73621cfb81d9a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <305c16960603081130g5367ddb3m4cbcf39a9253a087@mail.gmail.com> <305c16960603081225m68c26ff7wd3b73621cfb81d9a@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/8/06, Matheus Izvekov wrote: > Just discovered it needs usb debugging to be set. But isnt > inconsistent the fact that the atkbd driver does this differently from > the usbkbd driver? If its a good idea to print those messages by > default or one, why its not for the other? usbkbd will only report standard keys and is supposed in limited circumstances so it complaining about unknown keys is not very useful. Why do you need it? Doesn't hid driver work for you? -- Dmitry