From: "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: "Greg KH" <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: "Corey Minyard" <minyard@acm.org>,
"Russell King" <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@infradead.org>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>,
"Yani Ioannou" <yani.ioannou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Try 2, Fix release function in IPMI device model
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:18:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d120d5000603221318n7b4d664eh3cafc9260f6e12e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060322210820.GA12518@kroah.com>
On 3/22/06, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 02:45:01PM -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:
> > Ok, one more try. Russell, I assume you mean to use
> > platform_device_alloc(), which seems to do what you suggested.
> > And I assume the driver_data is the way to store whatever you
> > need, instead of using the container_of() macro.
> >
> > Arjun, Russell, thanks for the info.
> >
> > Now the patch...
> >
> > Arjun van de Ven pointed out that the changeover to the driver model
> > in the IPMI driver had some bugs in it dealing with the release
> > function and cleanup. Then Russell King pointed out that you can't
> > put release functions in the same module as the unregistering code.
>
> Yes you can, you just have to properly set up the module attribute
> owners and it will work just fine.
>
No, not really. You can only do that if _all_ sysfs attributes for the
object are handled in your driver which is rarely the case (dev,
/power/* attributes, etc).
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-22 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-22 20:45 Corey Minyard
2006-03-22 21:08 ` Greg KH
2006-03-22 21:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2006-03-22 21:35 ` Corey Minyard
2006-03-22 21:39 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-03-22 21:23 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-03-22 21:27 ` Corey Minyard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d120d5000603221318n7b4d664eh3cafc9260f6e12e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minyard@acm.org \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yani.ioannou@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®